BLUEPRINT FOR OVERTHROW: TRANSITION INTEGRITY PROJECT
September 15, 2020
Let’s
take a moment to think about something called the Transition Integrity
Project. Just by its name you’ll be impressed by a seemingly highly
moral commitment to honesty during the election. But wait: what about
that word ‘Transition’? Doesn’t it presuppose a change in the
presidency? Yes, it does. And it’s a ‘Project.’ What could that
mean? A project of what?
Nicolas Berggruen,
a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and the World Economic
Forum, is a billionaire who has spent at least 10 years and millions of
dollars in ‘reinventing and restructuring democracy.’ What could that
mean? Through his Berggruen Institute
this financier/stock market savant has suavely assembled groups of
‘influencers’ to do just that: to write books, form spin-off groups,
and endow positions in business and universities. Nicolas Berggruen is
the force behind the Transition Integrity Project.
I first
became aware of Berggruen in 2012 when his think tank ‘Think Long’
produced a ballot initiative in California with the intention of
changing the California constitution. ‘Think Long’ which included in
its elite membership Condelezza Rice, Willie Brown, Gray Davis, and Eric
Schmidt (Google CEO) was an alliance of neo-cons and ‘progressives’ who
wanted to use the California initiative process to literally craft a
new set of rules for governance. It was, as I called it in a speech
against their Proposition 31 which I gave at the Los Angeles Federal
Building, a razor blade buried in a candy apple—-a Trojan horse. This
craftily worded manipulation proposed using Agenda 21 Sustainable
Development federal grants to stealthily implement regional governance.
This
new law, this amendment to the California Constitution, would shift
state funds to local governments for the purpose of implementing new
‘Community Strategic Action Plans.’ What does that mean?
For
the purposes of ‘a prosperous economy, quality environment, and
community equity’ state revenue would be shared in supra-governmental,
unelected regional entities. Those who are paying attention will
recognize the 3 E’s of United Nations Agenda 21/Sustainable Development
in this deceptive proposition. Economy, Environment, Equity. This is
not just some happy coincidence. This is the legal and funding
mechanism for a regional layer of government. You don’t vote for
regional representation, as you know. You vote in city, county, state,
and federal elections. Agenda 21 is a global plan implemented locally
and you see it as regional plans.
Far from being a black
helicopter paranoiac fantasy UN Agenda 21 is real and Prop 31 is what it
looks like. It is a plan to take state money and allow local
entities-- counties and cities--to determine how that money gets
allocated as long as it goes for Smart Growth, the preferred development
style of UN Agenda 21. The Agenda for the 21st century was signed onto
by George HW Bush in 1992. President Clinton created the President’s
Council on Sustainable Development for the sole purpose of implementing
Agenda 21 in the US.
All federal agencies changed their policies
to conform to Sustainable Development principles, and it then moved into
the states and local municipalities via General Plans and regional
boards.
This is not a conspiracy theory, it is a conspiracy
fact. Regionalization is the stepping stone to global governance by
creating a parallel government and then funding it. These regions
already exist and are administered now by Metropolitan Planning
Organizations and Councils of Government like the Southern California
Association of Governments (SCAG) and Association of Bay Area
Governments (ABAG).
New urbanism is the goal and you’ll see
this as these new Community Strategic Action Plans dictate that your tax
dollars go for shifting funds to high density cities. That’s what they
mean by ‘a prosperous economy, quality environment, and community
equity’. It’s code for redistributing money to cities that agree to the
blurring or erasure of jurisdictional boundaries.
Prop 31 failed but he didn’t give up and came back later with another proposition which did pass.
Now, what is the Transition Integrity Project?
It’s a group (including John Podesta and Michael Steele, former Repub
Party head) of hard core neo-liberals and neo-con Never Trumpers who are
consolidated into a force for insurrection: Color Revolutionaries.
After cutting their teeth on Argentina, Ukraine, Venezuela, Egypt, etc
they’re ready for the Big Kahuna; the United States. Their premise is
‘What if Trump loses and won’t leave the White House?’ But really the
deal is ‘How will we respond when the ambiguous results of this
seriously flawed takeover are exposed?’ Berggruen paid for and organized
this tabletop exercise and, much like Event 201 and Dark Winter,
they’re readying for a revolutionary civil war here in the US. The
overthrow of the republic is being war-gamed.
Scenarios of
Biden/Harris being unable to establish their win and having to grab it
are played through with the recognition that the press will have to bear
down on us, and social media will need to shut us down, fast. Law
enforcement, military…this is a coup d’etat. The Transition Integrity
Project runs those scenarios, none of which includes Trump actually
winning, and makes it clear that complete disruption is the goal. This
is UN Agenda 21.
Destroying the existing system. RE-INVENTING Democracy is what they call it, and they do not intend to lose.
Source: https://www.democratsagainstunagenda21.com
Comment from technocracy.news
A group of high-powered globalists from the US, including John Podesta (Trilateral Commission), are plotting the overthrow of the United States to achieve the Great Reset of the Green New Deal and Sustainable Development, aka Technocracy. This subversion is a clear and present danger to the integrity of our national government and Constitution.
TIP is saturated with Trilateral Commission influence: John Podesta, Condalezza Rice, Eric Schmidt, Bill Clinton and Ernesto Zedillo. ⁃ TN Editor
Blogger's note: subterrnews.blogspot.com does not send cookies, or collect any information on those using the blog. However, the blogspot is on google, and google may collect information, and send cookies. Many of the links that we connect to do not send out cookies or collect information, but some do. You are keying in to this blog, and you have agreed to this.
The views expressed in the articles do not necessarily represent the opinions of this blog. They are the views, and opinions of the author(s) of the article.
0 comments:
Post a Comment