In
America, we have an oligarch problem, and it’s much bigger than the
oligarch problem that Putin faced when he became president in 2000. The
entire West is now in the grips of billionaire elites who have a
stranglehold on the media, the political establishment and all of our
important institutions. In recent years we have seen these oligarchs
expand their influence from markets, finance and trade to politics,
social issues and even public health. The impact this group has had
on these other areas of interest, has been nothing short of
breathtaking. Establishment elites and their media not only stood
foursquare behind Russiagate, the Trump impeachment, the BLM riots and
the January 6 fiasco, they also had a hand in the Covid hysteria and the
host of repressive measures that were imposed in the name of public
health. What we’d like to know is to what extent this group is actively
involved in the shaping of other events that are aimed at transforming
the American Republic into a more authoritarian system?
In other words,
are the mandated injections, the forced lockdowns, the aggressive
government-implemented censorship, the dubious presidential elections,
the burning of food processing plants, the derailing of trains, the
attacks on the power grid, the BLM-Antifa riots, the drag queen shows
for schoolchildren, the maniacal focus on gender issues, and glitzy
public show-trials merely random incidents occurring spontaneously
during a period of great social change or are they, in fact, evidence of
a stealthily orchestrated operation conducted by agents of the state
acting on behalf of their elite benefactors? We already know that
the FBI, the DOJ and the intel agencies were directly involved in
Russiagate –which was a covert attack on the sitting president of the
United States. So, the question is not “whether” these agencies are
actively involved in other acts of treachery but, rather, to what extent
these acts impact the lives or ordinary Americans, our politics and the
country? But before we answer that question, take a look at this quote
from from a recent interview by Colonel Douglas MacGregor:
I was reading a document that was authored by George Soros over 10 years
ago in which he talks specifically about this all-out war that would
ultimately come against Russia because he said this ‘was the last
nationalist state that rests on a foundation of orthodox christian
culture with Russian identity at its core. That has to be removed. So I
think that the people who are in charge in the west and the people in
charge in Washington think they have successfully destroyed the
identities of the European and American peoples, that we have no
sense of ourselves, our borders are undefended, we present no resistance
to the incoming migrants from the developing world who essentially roll
over us as though we owe them a living and that our laws do not count.
Thus, far I would say that is an accurate evaluation of what we’ve been
doing. And I think that’s a great victory for George Soros and the globalists,
the anti-nationalists; those who want open borders what they call it an
“Open Society” because you end up with nothing, an amorphous mass of
people struggling to survive who are reduced to the lowest levels of
subsistence … (Soros) even goes so far as to talk about how useful it
would be if it was east Europeans whose lives were expended in this
process and not west Europeans who simply won’t take the casualties. This
is not a minor matter. This is the kind of thinking that is so
destructive and so evil, in my judgement, that that’s what we’re really
dealing with in our own countries and I think Putin recognizes that.” (Douglas Macgregor – A Huge Offensive”, You Tube;, 11:20 minute)
The
reason I transcribed this comment from MacGregor was because it sums up
the perceptions of a great many people who see things the same way. It
expresses the hatred that globalist billionaires have toward
Christians and patriots, both of which they see as obstacles to their
goal of a borderless one-world government. MacGregor discusses this
phenom in relation to Russia which Soros sees as “the last nationalist
state that rests on a foundation of orthodox Christian culture with
Russian identity at its core.” But the same rule could be applied to the
January 6 protestors, could it not? Isn’t that the real reason the
protestors were rounded up and thrown into the Washington gulag. After
all, everyone knows there was no “insurrection” nor were there any
“white supremacists”. The protestors were locked up because they’re
nationalists (patriots) which are the natural enemy of the globalists.
The MacGregor quote lays it out in black and white. Elites don’t believe
that nationalists can be persuaded by propaganda,. They must be
eradicated through incarceration or worse. Isn’t that the underlying
message of January 6?
The
other underlying message of January 6, is that ordinary people are no
longer allowed to challenge the authority of the people in power. Again,
political legitimacy in the US has always been determined by elections.
What January 6 indicates, is that legitimacy no longer matters. What
matters is power, and the person who can have you arrested for questioning his authority, has all the power he needs. Check out this excerpt from a post on Substack by political analyst Kurt Nimmo:
“Klaus Schwab, a student of the war criminal Henry Kissinger, is a
mentor to power-hungry and narcissistic sociopaths. The WEF “Great
Reset” is designed to turn the world into an impoverished social
concentration camp, where destitute serfs “own nothing” and this, in
true Orwellian fashion, will set them free…
I
challenge people to investigate the WEF’s Global Redesign Initiative.
According to the Transnational Institute in the Netherlands, this
“initiative” proposes
a
transition away from intergovernmental decision-making towards a system
of multi-stakeholder governance. In other words, by stealth, they are
marginalizing a recognized model where we vote in governments who then
negotiate treaties which are then ratified by our elected
representatives with a model where a self-selected group of
‘stakeholders’ make decisions on our behalf. (Emphasis added.)
In
other words, large transnational corporate “stakeholders” will be
deciding where you live, what you eat (insects and weeds), how you
reproduce (or not reproduce; children produce carbon emissions), and
what you can “rent” from them, or not be allowed to rent if you complain
about an unelected globalist “economic” cartel driving humanity into
serfdom, worldwide poverty, and depopulation.” (“WEF Calls for Destruction of America’s Middle Class“, Kurt Nimmo on Geopolitics)
What
Nimmo is saying is that these billionaire elites are now so powerful,
that they can openly say they’re going to “transition away from
intergovernmental decision-making” (ie– representative government”) to a
system of “multi-stakeholder governance.” If I’m not mistaken, that is a
pretty unambiguous declaration of a new form of supra-national
government, in which only the billionaire stakeholders have a vote in
what policies are implemented. But isn’t that the way things work
already? On any number of topics from ESG, to digital currencies, to
vaccine passports, to AI, to gain-of-function research, to 15-minute
cities, to transhumanism, to war with Russia; the decisions are all
being made by a handful of people of whom we know every little and who
were never voted into office.
Read more
