Harari Calls for Social Media Censorship of ‘Disinformation Narratives’ Undermining WEF Agenda

Fact checked by The People's Voice Community

September 14, 2024 Baxter Dmitry

World governments must clamp down on free speech on the internet, according to Yuval Noah Harari who warns that “disinformation narratives” are flourishing online and must be eliminated as a matter of urgency.

Source, read more & video

All Nations Take Heed

 

Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for more The disaster that is the Pact for the Future Bear with me; I am trying to identify the most effective way of conveying this important material. Please share. Consensus on this document will be sought at the UN in 8 days! In 10 points, what does the Pact for the Future tell us? Meryl Nass, MD. September 15, 2024 1.  Global governance is to be transformed and strengthened "We will transform global governance" which will lead "to a brighter future for all of humanity."  But this will require greater international cooperation and compliance with international law. [paragraphs 3-5, and Action 41] "We will strengthen the UN system" [Action 48] 2.  Assuring compliance "Where mandated intergovernmental processes exist, we will use them to advance this agenda." [paragraph 17] "We will strengthen international cooperation for the environment and the implementation of and compliance with our multilateral environmental agreements to deliver on our ambition to protect our planet." [Action 58]  "Deepen United Nations’ engagement with national parliaments in United Nations intergovernmental bodies and processes, in accordance with national legislation, including through building on the efforts of the United Nations and Inter-Parliamentary Union to engage parliamentarians to maintain support for the implementation of relevant UN agreements and resolutions." [Action 59]  3.  Dictatorial authority sought for the UN Secretary-General, echoing the plan for the WHO's Director-General in the Pandemic Treaty and proposed IHR amendments Echoing the WHO's pandemic aspirations, the Pact seeks to give the UN Secretary-General the sole authority to operationalize an "Emergency Platform," for any type of emergency he designates, to decide which emergencies warrant this declaration, to decide when to trigger this authority, and to determine how to manage the emergency. [Action 57] 4.  Sustainable Development to be at the center of multilateralism (i.e., global governance) and at the center of a new global financial architecture While "development" was one of the original 3 pillars of the UN, sometimes listed as 4 pillars, the Pact now claims that "Sustainable Development" is one of the essential 3 pillars of the UN. [paragraph 9] This is a gross misrepresentation, because the term "sustainable development" is used interchangeably with the Agenda for Sustainable Development, Agenda 2030 and the 17 Sustainable Development Goals, none of which existed when the UN was founded, and they have an entirely different meaning than the general term "development." The Pact claims that sustainable development is "a central objective of multilateralism" [paragraph 10] and furthermore, "we will accelerate reform of the international financial architecture to address the challenges of today and tomorrow... the reform of the international financial architecture should place the 2030 agenda at its center" [Action 50].  But the world's citizens never voted to make Agenda 2030 the centerpiece of multilateralism, nor have they asked for the creation of a wholly new financial architecture, for which the UN lacks expertise and probably also lacks authority. While the Pact acknowledges in paragraph 18 that "the achievement of the sustainable development goals is in peril. Progress on most of the goals is either moving too slowly or has regressed below the 2015 baseline," paragraph 19 states that nations are to reaffirm that "the 2030 agenda for sustainable development is our overarching roadmap for achieving development..."  Why would anyone, let alone the entire world, follow a roadmap that has failed to yield progress during the past 9 years? 5.  Suspicious goals for health The Pact specifically desires to ensure universal access for sexual and reproductive health and for vaccinations, but fails to make similar assurances for access to primary health care. [paragraphs 27 and 63] 6.  References to many prior agreements, without specifying what in these other documents is being referred to, make the Pact deliberately obfuscatory Several paragraphs are indecipherable, referring to up to 3 different prior agreements but failing to specify what precisely in those agreements is being referred to. [paragraph 28 (a)] There is use of language to conceal the actual meaning of what is being discussed.  For example, "Deliver on our agreed commitment to hold and reverse biodiversity loss by 2030 and implement all multilateral environmental agreements."  This is actually a demand to appropriate private land for the Natura 2000 and 30 by 30 initiatives. [paragraph 29 (e)] 7.  Doubletalk:  the UN wants to have it both ways and hopes we don't notice The UN uses doubletalk, calling for censorship and free speech at the same time. [paragraph 39(g)]   In similar doubletalk, it calls for "talent" mobility at the same time it calls to prevent a brain drain. [paragraph 54 (c)] A third instance of doubletalk is that the Pact calls for technology to help developing countries, while calling for enforcement of intellectual property rights. [paragraph 56 and Action 33] 8.  The Pact echoes the WHO's Biosecurity Agenda, and like the WHO Pandemic Treaty and IHR amendments,  includes both censorship of information and the need to promote trust in science (which are apparently necessary elements to achieve global control) The Pact is in line with the WHO's Biosecurity Agenda [paragraph 48 (c)] and desires to build "trust" in science [paragraph 54 (a)] harkening back to the WHO's COVID agenda, which controlled and censored "the science" the public was allowed to hear. 9.  Outlandish aspirations Some Pact aspirations are frankly outlandish, such as "achieve a world in which humanity lives in harmony with nature." [paragraph 29(a)] Or, "We believe there is a path to a brighter future for all of humanity, including those living in poverty and vulnerable situations. Through the actions we take today, we resolve to set ourselves on that path, striving for a world that is safe, peaceful, just, equal, inclusive, sustainable and prosperous, a world in which human wellbeing, security and dignity and a healthy planet are assured." [paragraph 4] 10. Hypocrisy While the expressed aspiration is to end war crimes, use of starvation for war, genocide, crimes against humanity, etc., we hear little about meaningful UN actions in this regard, despite the continuing occurrence of such atrocities. [paragraph 35 (g,h)] Conclusion The Pact for the Future is an overblown, repetitive, redundant, dishonest document. Unlike a normal treaty, it drowns us in generalities and tucks its few specifics into dark corners, relying on vague references to other documents to provide the actualities. It asserts, without justification, that the Agenda for Sustainable Development must be at the center of multilateralism and at the center of a wholly new financial architecture. While replete with outlandish and vague aspirations and doubletalk, buried deep within the document is a frightening proposal first floated in the UN's Policy Brief 2 of 2023.  This proposal seeks agreement of the UN General Assembly (UNGA) to create an "Emergency Platform" which would be activated whenever the UN Secretary-General (S-G) decided there was a "global shock" of any kind affecting more than one country. This could be a climate emergency, supply chain emergency, pandemic or 'black swan' event. The Secretary General and the "Emergency Platform" would then take over management of the emergency, deciding when to initiate their actions and when to end them.  There are NO standards specified in the Policy Brief or the Pact that would limit the UN's actions in any way.  There is no requirement for agreement by affected nation states, the UNGA or the Security Council. This would provide the UN S-G with more power than any human being has ever had, to do with as he wishes.  While on the one hand it is a preposterous and unjustified power grab, and is unlike anything the UN has previously attempted, the UN and the powers behind the UN are deadly serious about gaining this global authority over the entire world. The Pact is a dire threat to every nation, and it must be stopped. Meryl Nass Sep 15 Source Blogger's note:  This is an end run around the UN Charter.  Guterres wants to be the dictator of the World.

 

UN ‘Pact for the Future’: Digital IDs, Vaccine Passports, Massive Censorship

World leaders will convene later this month in New York to discuss proposals that critics believe will enshrine global digital ID and online censorship and give the U.N. secretary-general unprecedented emergency powers.

by Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D.

September 12, 2024

World leaders will convene later this month in New York to discuss proposals that critics believe will enshrine global digital ID and online censorship and give the United Nations (U.N.) secretary-general unprecedented emergency powers.

Proposals to be discussed at the 79th U.N. General Assembly include the Pact for the Future, described by the U.N. as an “opportunity to create international mechanisms that better reflect the realities of the 21st century and can respond to today’s and tomorrow’s challenges and opportunities.”

The proposed Pact for the Future encompasses 11 policy proposals. These include proposals for the establishment of a U.N. “Emergency Platform” and a “Global Digital Compact,” and policy proposals on “Information Integrity” and “Transforming Education.”

Also among the U.N.’s proposals is the “Declaration on Future Generations.”

Under these proposals, the secretary-general would have “standing authority” to declare “an Emergency Platform in the event of a future complex global shock of sufficient scale, severity and reach.”

Source & read more

Go to Twitter to (2) Ape𝕏 (@CubanOnlyTrump)

 Go to Twitter to (2) Ape𝕏 (@CubanOnlyTrump) / X, and see what I cannot post due to censorship.  It is a story of a young boy killed by Hattians. 

These are invaders taken into the US under Biden/Harris policies.

Russia’s ambassador to Washington warns that Americans will be under TOTAL CENSORSHIP as Election Day approaches

 Russia’s ambassador to Washington warns that Americans will be under TOTAL CENSORSHIP as Election Day approaches

08/22/2024 // Ethan Huff 

Anatoly Antonov, Russia's ambassador to Washington, says that the only people in the United States who still have freedom of speech under the First Amendment are those who express pro-establishment views – all others are now being subjected to a "political inquisition," he warns.

Antonov's statements came after the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) conducted a raid on the home of Russia-born U.S. political analyst and author Dimitri Simes in Virginia. Simes is a vocal critic of Joe Biden who has been co-hosting a geopolitical talk show on Russia's Channel 1 since 2018.

The Simes raid was part of a political "witch hunt," according to Antonov, who warned on Telegram that things will likely get much worse the closer we get to the November 5 election.

"Hundreds of people are declared undesirable just because they dare to contradict the policies of the administration," Antonov wrote. "They are forbidden from having their own point of view" as government agents are "breaking into homes, performing searches and seizing documents."

(Related: Did you hear that the campaign of Kamala Harris is producing fake ads for the internet that falsely imply major media outlets support the Harris-Walz ticket?)

Source & read more

 

UK Riots: The Agenda Becomes Clear...

by Tyler Durden

Sunday, Aug 04, 2024 - 11:00 PM

Authored by Kit Knightly via Off-Guardian.org,

Those outside the UK might not have heard, but it’s been a violent week in the UK. Here’s a quick rundown of the official story so far:

Four days ago a 17-year-old allegedly walked into a children’s “Taylor Swift dance class” (whatever that might be)  in Southport and started stabbing little girls, wounding 10 and killing 3.

It was initially reported the boy was a muslim immigrant.

This story was, however, reversed within hours, the new story “revealing” that he was actually born in Cardiff, the son of Rwandan immigrants. He was named as “Axel Muganwa Rudakubana” late yesterday.

His  religious affiliation, if any, seems not to have been firmly established.

Another young man was, allegedly,  arrested later while in possession of a machete and balaclava at  a vigil for the victims. He was, again, reportedly Muslim.

This, allegedly, resulted in what are described as protests and riots, the destruction of a brick wall outside a mosque and the burning of a police van.

Further alleged riots subsequently sprang up in London and Hartlepool.

This is the current narrative. None of the details has been substantiated as yet, so how much you decide to believe is your personal preference at this point.

At OffG we reserve the right to be sceptical. Of everything.

Source & read more

 

EU offered X secret censorship deal – Musk

Brussels has gone after the platform over alleged “deceptive practices”

X (formerly Twitter) is facing persecution by the European Union because it rejected Brussels’ demand to secretly censor opinions on the platform, its owner Elon Musk has revealed.

The EU announced on Friday that it considered X in violation of its Digital Services Act (DSA) and intended to levy massive fines against the company unless it changed its practices.

“The European Commission offered X an illegal secret deal: if we quietly censored speech without telling anyone, they would not fine us,” Musk wrote in response. “The other platforms accepted that deal. X did not.”

“We look forward to a very public battle in court, so that the people of Europe can know the truth,” he added.

Read more

Blogger's note:  EU lies must prevail, and not the truth.

 

THE GLOBAL CENSORSHIP RACKET! - Australia Bans Independent Research! From Hate Speech To Technocracy

Video 

World Alternative Media

Apr 21, 2024

Josh Sigurdson reports on the global normalization of censorship for the purpose of getting everyone to bow to a technocratic censorship racket which surveils all people and punishes "wrongthink" by withholding people's money and restricting food rations. Following the Sydney church stabbing of Bishop Mar Mari Emanuel, the Australian police made it clear that no one is to share or read information that doesn't come directly from the police. Research is considered off limits. Guilt by association is the norm. Of course punishing those targeting Christians in Australia and New Zealand is off the table, but questioning the narrative surrounding the attacks is "dangerous" according to the government. This is the epitome of Orwellian doublethink and it's meant to divide the public. It is also meant as a litmus test for future technocratic censorship. Canada has banned news from being shared on Facebook. The narrative is set by the state run media. Scotland has pushed forward hate speech legislations that could lead to 7 years in prison if you "insult" a trans person. A law that has been harshly and rightly criticized by Harry Potter author JK Rowling. The Brazilian government is banning Twitter/X (a psyop in itself as Twitter continues to gather people's information, build a social credit system, register itself as a bank and censor people). Australia is also telling Twitter/X that it must censor stories regarding the stabbings or face 750,000 Australian dollars in fines each day. ChatGPT is being trained to only parrot mainstream talking points. Canada is releasing a social credit system. The federal government is making Google hand over any search histories that involve watching "the wrong thing" on YouTube which is entirely vague. Germany's interior minister is saying anyone who donates to a so-called "far right wing organization" should be surveilled at all times. Nigeria is launching a full scale national ID, much like Bill Gates' and the United Nation's digital ID in Sierra Leone as we previously reported. Kenya launched a carbon credit score that is already restricting thousands from buying food. If it isn't blatantly obvious at this point that the censorship we are seeing will inevitably lead to a dystopian technocratic environment with 15 Minute Cities, digital IDs, social credit, carbon credits, CBDCs and food rations, people aren't paying attention! Meanwhile, though people are leaving the mainstream media in droves, people are turning to as David Icke calls it, "Mainstream Alternative Media" which is further promoting an opposing narrative which perpetuates the slumber. These medias self censor and keep people in fear for fears and money while a small few independent medias (we'd like to believe we're one of them) provides the real news unfettered and without caring who we offend as well as provide solutions to these very real psychological operations. In this video, we break down where this is all leading and what can be done about it.

Stay tuned for more from WAM!

 

 

The Real Intent Of A Bill Is Always Hidden

 Blogger's note:  Only a RINO fool would vote for this bill.  It really has nothing to do with TikTok.  It is all about censorship.  My dumb ass no ball, no brains, no backbone Representative voted for this.  The Israelis wanted TikTok banned and any other social platform or website banned if it was not supportive of Zionist genocide.  Wake up Goy.

 

Blogger's note:  As of Monday Google has prevented me from sending links to my blog.  Google used to be the best search engine, but no more.  Google is a purveyor of liesl