He Said She Said--Rachel Mitchell

Prosecutor Rachel Mitchell Highlights Massive Inconsistencies In Christine Ford’s Testimony

“A ‘he said, she said’ case is incredibly difficult to prove. But this case is even weaker than that.”

Chris Menahan | Information Liberation - October 1, 2018

Image Credits: Screenshot.

Sex crimes prosecutor Rachel Mitchell, who questioned Christine Blasey Ford during the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing last week, released a report on Sunday highlighting a massive list of inconsistencies in Ford’s testimony.
“In the legal context, here is my bottom line,” Mitchell said. “A ‘he said, she said’ case is incredibly difficult to prove. But this case is even weaker than that.”
“Dr. Ford identified other witnesses to the event, and those witnesses either refuted her allegations or failed to corroborate them,” Mitchell said. “For the reasons discussed below, I do not think that a reasonable prosecutor would bring this case based on the evidence before the Committee. Nor do I believe that this evidence is sufficient to satisfy the preponderance-of-the-evidence standard.”
Here’s the key points which you can also read in PDF format.




See the PDF for the timeline.

source Infowars:   https://www.infowars.com/prosecutor-rachel-mitchell-highlights-massive-inconsistencies-in-christine-fords-testimony/

Body Language: Brett Kavanaugh Hearing Christine Blasey Ford

Body Language Ghost

Published on Sep 27, 2018

 

Blogger's note:  When trying to post this video this is what comes up

 

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=418&v=uGxr1VQ2dPI

Again this is censorship of the video that analyzes the body language of the actress Christine Blasey Ford.  The more the Deep State and their co-conspirators censor these articles, and videos the more that it tells us that Judge Kavanaugh is telling the truth.  This clearly shows that this was a conspiracy by the Democrats and Ford to derail the Trump appointments and policies.

Video  (Hopefully this link works)

Blogger's note:  subterrnews.blogspot.com does not send cookies, or collect any information on those using the blog.  However, the blogspot is on google, and google may collect information, and send cookies.  Many of the links that  we connect to do not send out cookies or collect information, but some do.  Your keying in to this blog you have agreed to this.

 

Records Show Dr. Ford Is Not A Licensed Psychologist, May Have Committed Perjury

According to records, Ford is not licensed in the state of California

Chadwick Moore | Dangerous - September 28, 2018

Image Credits: YouTube Screenshot.

Testifying under oath before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Christine Blasey Ford identified herself as a ‘psychologist,’ but records indict this is a false statement under California law. Someone at Stanford University also appears to have caught the blunder and edited Ford’s faculty page.
Just one sentence into her sworn testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee regarding allegations of sexual assault against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, Dr. Christine Blasey Ford may have told a lie.
After thanking members of the committee on Thursday, and while under oath, Ford opened her testimony saying, “My name is Christine Blasey Ford, I am a professor of psychology at Palo Alto University and a research psychologist at the Stanford University School of Medicine.”

The issue lies with the word “psychologist,” and Ford potentially misrepresenting herself and her credentials, an infraction that is taken very seriously in the psychology field as well as under California law.
Under California law, in order for a person to identify publicly as a psychologist they must be licensed by the California Board of Psychology, a process that includes 3,000 hours of post-doctoral professional experience and passing two rigorous exams. To call oneself a psychologist without being licensed by a state board is the equivalent of a law school graduate calling herself a lawyer without ever taking the bar exam.

Read more

Blogger's note:  subterrnews.blogspot.com does not send cookies, or collect any information on those using the blog.  However, the blogspot is on google, and google may collect information, and send cookies.  Many of the links that  we connect to do not send out cookies or collect information, but some do.  Your keying in to this blog you have agreed to this.

   

CIA Honeytrap set - Kavanaugh accuser CIA ties

by globalintelhub

Sun, 09/23/2018 - 21:49

 

 Global Intel Hub (Zero Hedge Exclusive) -- 9/23/2018 -- A Supreme Court Judge Brett Kavanaugh is tied up in a controversy that can prevent him from being elected to the Supreme Court for life.  As we explain in our book Splitting Pennies and Splitting Bits, the world is not as it seems.
All of the other witnesses have come forward and stated they have no recollection of the event, and have taken a step further to say that Brett Kavanaugh is an honest, ethical, and respectable individual:

Everyone at the party has said they have no idea what Christine Blasey Ford is talking about, even her longtime friend Leland Ingham Keyser! Also potentially damaging to Blasey Ford's claim is a theory presented Thursday by Ed Whelan,  a former clerk to USSC Justice Antonin Scalia and currently president of the Ethics and Public Policy Center (EPPC), a conservative think tank. Using entirely circumstantial evidence which could certainly ruin the life of the man at the center of the new theory, Whelan suggested that Kavanaugh's high school doppelgänger, Chris Garrett, may have in fact been responsible for Blasey Ford's recollection of the alleged incident.

Before we dig deeper let's understand deep state forces a bit better.  The CIA, et. al (this means in latin 'and friends') utilize a number of techniques to achieve their goals, 'whatever works.' 

Read more

Blogger's note:  subterrnews.blogspot.com does not send cookies, or collect any information on those using the blog.  However, the blogspot is on google, and google may collect information, and send cookies.  Many of the links that  we connect to do not send out cookies or collect information, but some do.  Your keying in to this blog you have agreed to this.