In the lead up to a major crisis one often finds that a simulation of
that crisis have very recently been quietly carried out by the state
and other actors in high places. Sometimes, to make matters even
stranger, these simulations are occurring as the real crisis is
unfolding. Ultimately those simulating the disaster go on to manage the
real thing which begs the question, when does a coincidence stop being a
coincidence?
In the wake of 9/11 George Bush famously said that nobody could have
“envisioned flying airplanes into buildings” to justify his regime’s
failure to thwart the attacks. This was of course wildly untrue as
numerous agencies had simulated this event numerous times as recently as
August 2001. On the day of 9/11 there were numerous operations
simulating terrorist attacks
being run around the country. When the air traffic control in Boston
first reported that a hijacked plane was headed for New York and they
needed F16s scrambled, the responder infamously asked, “Is this real-world or exercise?”
Years later in London a very similar situation played out. On the
morning of July 7, 2005 four suicide bombings occurred on four
Underground trains across the city. Meanwhile, a crisis management firm
run by a self-styled terror expert was running a simulation in which bombs went off in the same Underground stations at the same time the real attacks were taking place.
As autumn set in across the northern hemisphere in 2019 there was a
simulation being run in New York City where a novel coronavirus was
spreading throughout the world. Event 201
as it was called was hosted by The Johns Hopkins Center for Health
Security and included representatives from the Bill and Melinda Gates
Foundation, World Economic Forum, CDC, UN, and a former CIA spook. All
of these agencies and organizations would go on to play major roles in
the handling of the so-called pandemic that crippled the planet in 2020.
What has followed from each of these simulations and real-world events have been paradigm shifting changes in society.
9/11 ushered in the security state with the purported free world
seeing civil liberties and freedom dismantled while hell was unleashed
across the developing world in the name of combating terrorism. The
bombings on 7/7 and many other terror-related events would reenforce the
need for bureaucracies to grow and the war machine march on over the
years. Defense contractors, weapons manufacturers, and the otherwise
well-connected lined their pockets in the aftermath. The state continued
to sprawl in size and seized more control over the lives of its
citizens as it slithered along.
Today we are witnessing a transition, or perhaps a merger, as the
national security state becomes the biosecurity state. The erection of
the security state apparatus which included militarized police,
biometric data collection, and relentless propaganda only needs the
slightest tweaking to maintain its purpose in this new era. The public
is once again living through mass hysteria
as they face a virus that poses no greater risk to them than being the
victim of a terrorist attack did two decades ago. Afghanistan and Iraq
are still occupied twenty years later and newer conflicts in Yemen and
Syria have since begun in the name of fighting the global war on terror
and if people like CFR member, Juliette Kayyem and the Bill and Melinda Gates funded, Peter Hotez get their way, the tactics used to combat Islamic terror can be applied to those who uphold their bodily autonomy.
The biosecurity state is just one small part of the agenda that is
unfolding in the age of vaccine mandates, lockdowns, and masks. When the
World Economic Forum (WEF) met in June 2020 for their 50th annual
meeting they promoted their idea of The Great Reset
which aims to reshape society in almost every conceivable way, from
energy consumption and urban life to education and human rights. This
new era has already dawned as society begins to harness the innovations
of the largely post-human Fourth Industrial Revolution according to
comic supervillain impersonator and WEF CEO, Klaus Schwab.
The folks at the World Economic Forum, apparently not busy enough
uprooting the global order, held another simulation around the same time
named Cyber Polygon 2020
in which participants roleplayed preventing a “digital pandemic” which
would largely target the health and financial industries. This year’s
version sees the WEF partnering with Russia’s Sberbank, its
cybersecurity subsidiary BI.ZONE, and INTERPOL to simulate responses to
two cyberattacks which showcase how “a single vulnerable link is enough
to bring down the entire system, just like the domino effect.”
When an organization like the WEF has a short-lived but prophetic
habit of simulating catastrophes which quickly come to pass it behooves
one to pay attention. This is doubly so when a “cyber 9/11” has been on
the minds of those in Washington since the towers went down and Harvard
Law School professor, Lawrence Lessig has confirmed that a digital
version of the Patriot Act is just waiting in the wings. “I had dinner
once with Richard Clarke at the table,” he told
the crowd at Fortune’s Brainstorm Tech conference. “And I said, ‘Is
there an equivalent to the Patriot Act — an iPatriot Act — just sitting,
waiting for some substantial event? Just waiting for them to come have
the excuse for radically changing the way the Internet works?’ And he
said, ‘Of course there is’ — and I swear this is what he said — ‘and
Vint Cerf is not going to like it very much.'”
With this in mind we must look back over the past couple of months at
several events which nearly had the domino effect that the WEF is
preparing for. In 2020 it was discovered that a worldwide data breach
had been ongoing for eight or nine months and had compromised data held
by the U.S. government, NATO, European Parliament, Microsoft, Cisco,
Belkin and others. This past week the southern U.S. suffered a brief gas
shortage when ransomware attack
caused the Colonial Pipeline Company to halt all of the pipeline’s
operations to contain the attack. Though both incidents have been
contained so far it’s easy to see how such attacks could be the one
which bring down the global order. With health care systems around the
world “on the brink of collapse” due to the coronavirus once again, the
U.S. dollar inflating, a major bridge
over which much of the U.S’s agricultural products flow being shut
down, and a war in Israel going hot there are no shortages of places to
look for potential disaster.
It makes perfect sense that those in both the public and private
sectors spend time training for a crisis. Even if a calamitous event
only happens once in a generation it is better to be prepared than
unprepared. But what happens when the ones doing the preparing also have
the most to gain from the disaster?
This conflict of interests historically holds little promise for the
public who suffer through war and poverty while the social engineers
continue to amass wealth and centralize power. If the past year has
taught us anything it is that this group has a grim plan for humanity
that is only just getting started. If we allow their agenda to unfold as
the Cyber Polygon 2021 draws near, we can expect a calamitous summer in
which The Great Reset marches on.
Thank you for reading. If you wish to support What About The Roads please consider subscribing to our Patreon, Subscribestar, or send us an email with other ways to donate.
Source: https://whatabouttheroads.co/gas-shortages-and-simulations/
Be the first to comment.
Blogger's note:
subterrnews.blogspot.com does not send cookies, or collect any information on
those using the blog. However, the blogspot is on google, and google may
collect information, and send cookies. Many of the links that we
connect to do not send out cookies or collect information, but some do.
You are keying in to this blog, and you have agreed to this.
The views expressed in the articles do not
necessarily represent the opinions of this blog. They are the views, and opinions of the
author(s) of the article
