Technocracy Rising: All The President’s Men
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/956a5/956a5b9f85abde9182a49c05f0efdc47ebce8c1b" alt=""
Here is my prompt:
List all the people who are from the tech sector who are considered technocrats and who have been appointed by Donald Trump in 2025. Include informal advisors like Marc Andreessen, Peter Thiel, and anybody who has been mentored by Thiel or who was a member of the Paypal Mafia. Are there any shared objectives by these Technocrats?
The analysis concludes,
Their shared objectives—AI supremacy, cryptocurrency normalization, and federal privatization—underscore a broader ideological shift toward technocratic authoritarianism, where technological innovation is framed as an existential imperative beyond democratic accountability.
Not bad for an AI, but you must be careful to ask right question in the first place. ⁃ Patrick Wood, Editor.
The Technocratic Vanguard: Silicon Valley’s Influence in the 2025 Trump Administration
The 2025 Trump administration has ushered in an unprecedented integration of Silicon Valley technocrats into federal governance, marked by the appointment of key figures from the PayPal Mafia network and their ideological allies. These individuals, spanning formal roles and informal advisory positions, share a cohesive vision centered on deregulation, technological dominance, and the restructuring of federal institutions to align with libertarian-leaning tech industry priorities. Their collective agenda prioritizes artificial intelligence (AI) innovation, cryptocurrency proliferation, and the erosion of regulatory frameworks perceived as barriers to private-sector growth. This report examines the key appointees, their interconnected networks, and the shared objectives driving their policy influence.
Formal Appointments: Technocrats in Key Government Roles
Michael J.K. Kratsios: Director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy
A protégé of Peter Thiel, Kratsios returned to the White House after roles at Thiel’s investment firms and Scale AI. His appointment reflects the administration’s focus on consolidating AI policy under industry-aligned leadership. Kratsios has prioritized streamlining federal AI regulations to accelerate private-sector innovation, notably through Executive Order 14110’s revocation, which dismantled Biden-era AI ethics safeguards.
David Sacks: White House AI & Crypto Czar
As a PayPal Mafia stalwart and co-host of the All-In podcast, Sacks embodies the fusion of tech entrepreneurship and political advocacy. His role involves overseeing cryptocurrency regulatory frameworks and AI development, with an emphasis on minimizing SEC oversight of digital assets. Sacks’ influence extends to chairing the Presidential Council of Advisers for Digital Assets, which advocates for policies favoring stablecoin adoption and blockchain integration in federal systems.
Sriram Krishnan: Senior AI Policy Advisor
Krishnan, a venture capitalist at Andreessen Horowitz, bridges Silicon Valley’s AI investment community and federal policy. His mandate includes promoting “unbiased” AI systems—a term aligned with conservative critiques of algorithmic fairness initiatives—and fostering public-private partnerships to bolster U.S. competitiveness against China.
Bo Hines: Executive Director of the Presidential Council of Advisers for Digital Assets
A former congressional candidate, Hines represents the younger generation of Thiel-affiliated operatives. His council focuses on legitimizing cryptocurrency markets, advocating for tax incentives for blockchain startups, and opposing central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) as threats to decentralized finance.
Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy: Co-Leads of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE)
Musk’s informal yet outsized role involves privatizing federal functions, particularly in aerospace and energy, through DOGE. His collaboration with biotech entrepreneur Ramaswamy aims to dismantle “bloated” agencies like the EPA and FCC, redirecting resources toward SpaceX and Tesla-led initiatives. Ramaswamy’s anti-regulatory stance dovetails with Musk’s vision of a “startup-like” government.
Informal Advisors and Power Brokers
Peter Thiel: Architect of the Technocratic Pipeline
Though lacking an official title, Thiel’s influence permeates the administration. He mentored Vice President JD Vance, whose Senate campaign Thiel bankrolled with $15 million, and shaped the appointments of at least 10 associates, including Michael Kratsios and Ambassador Ken Howery. Thiel’s objectives include curbing immigration, defunding academic institutions deemed “woke,” and expanding Palantir’s federal contracts for data analytics.
Marc Andreessen: Venture Capitalist and Policy Influencer
Andreessen, co-author of the Techno-Optimist Manifesto, advises on antitrust policy, pushing to weaken enforcement against tech monopolies. His firm, Andreessen Horowitz, benefits from relaxed SEC rules under appointee Paul Atkins, enabling aggressive crypto investments.
Joe Lonsdale: Palantir Co-Founder and GOP Megadonor
Lonsdale, a PayPal Mafia member, funds pro-Trump PACs and advocates for privatizing national security infrastructure. His firm, 8VC, collaborates with the Pentagon on AI-driven defense projects, aligning with Thiel’s vision of “apolitical” tech governance.
The PayPal Mafia Network: From Silicon Valley to Washington
Core Members in Governance
- Elon Musk: DOGE lead, leveraging SpaceX and Tesla for federal contracts.
- David Sacks: Crypto czar, Craft Ventures founder.
- Ken Howery: Ambassador to Denmark, Thiel Capital co-founder.
- Luke Nosek: Informal advisor on renewable energy deregulation via Founders Fund.
Thiel’s Mentees and Protegés
- JD Vance: Vice President, former Mithril Capital executive.
- Blake Masters: Though unsuccessful in his Senate bid, Masters advises on labor policy automation.
- Jay Bhattacharya: NIH Director, advocate for AI-driven healthcare privatization.
Shared Objectives of the Technocratic Coalition
Deregulation and Privatization
The cohort uniformly seeks to dismantle federal oversight, exemplified by Executive Order 14110’s revocation and SEC Chair Paul Atkins’ pledge to reduce enforcement actions. Crypto regulations are targeted for rollback, with Sacks and Hines promoting state-level “sandboxes” to bypass federal scrutiny.
AI Dominance and “Unbiased” Systems
Kratsios and Krishnan frame AI policy through a lens of “ideological neutrality,” opposing equity-focused algorithms and redirecting NIH funds toward AI-driven drug discovery. Thiel and Musk advocate for unrestricted AI development in defense applications, prioritizing Palantir and SpaceX partnerships.
Cryptocurrency as a Fiscal Paradigm
The administration’s embrace of crypto includes proposals for a strategic Bitcoin reserve and opposition to CBDCs. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, a Thiel ally, supports tax exemptions for crypto transactions, while Howard Lutnick’s Commerce Department advances Tether integration in trade.
Anti-China Technological Competition
Policy shifts emphasize decoupling from Chinese tech supply chains, with DOGE spearheading reshoring of semiconductor production through subsidies to Musk’s ventures. Defense appointees like Emil Michael prioritize AI-enabled warfare systems to counter Chinese advancements.
Institutional Dismantling and Personnel Overhauls
Project 2025’s influence is evident in plans to replace career civil servants with political appointees. Russell Vought (OMB) and Brendan Carr (FCC) aim to defund agencies like the Department of Education, redirecting resources to privatized alternatives.
Conclusion: A New Era of Technocratic Governance
The 2025 Trump administration represents a watershed moment in Silicon Valley’s political entrenchment. Through formal appointments and informal networks, the PayPal Mafia and its allies have institutionalized a deregulatory agenda that conflates corporate profit with national interest. Their shared objectives—AI supremacy, cryptocurrency normalization, and federal privatization—underscore a broader ideological shift toward technocratic authoritarianism, where technological innovation is framed as an existential imperative beyond democratic accountability. As these technocrats consolidate power, the long-term implications for regulatory integrity and public trust in governance remain deeply uncertain.
Posted with the permission of the author.