WORLD WAR III: Ukrainian flight PS752 Western False Flag
Remote Hijacking/Transponder Disabling to Trigger Two Tor-M1 missiles
I managed a false flag operation for the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and wrote the original warning letter to the White House, in 1994, on the vulnerability of all electronic systems.
Since then I have published a book called “False Flag Attacks: A Tool of the Deep State” and many articles and chapters on the many US and Israeli false flags and the continued vulnerability of all systems, including particularly Boeing aircraft that are designed to enable US and Israeli remote hijacking that can, in addition to taking control away from the pilots, can also turn off the radio and the transponder.
I believe this event was a false flag event designed to discredit the Supreme Leader and the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) while also seeking to drive a wedge between Iran and Ukraine, the latter being central to the US-dominated nuclear smuggling ring that President Barack Obama, Vice President Joe Biden, and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton nurtured and protected in return for tens of millions of dollars in bribes.
Here is what I think happened, with a tip of the hat to Ian Greenhalgh of Veterans Today, whose articles, “Exclusive: PS752 Shot Down In Regime Change Attempt” and “Delving Deeper into PS752” have both been helpful to my reflections.
01- The Boeing aircraft, designed to be hijacked by the US or Israel governments at any time including via satellite
– a nearby aircraft is not needed – was remotely taken over. Both the
communications system and the transponder were turned off. Whether the
pilots were allowed to retain control or not, the aircraft indisputably
turned back toward the airport from which it had taken off minutes
earlier.
02- Because the transponder was
turned off, the aircraft, uniquely among the many flights approaching,
was identified by the Tor-M1 integrated transport, launch, and radar
unit, as hostile. If the crew was taking a break and had the
unit set on “auto” then the system would have fired a missile as soon as
the “hostile” aircraft was in range, never mind that it was moving very
slowly, was on a known international commercial trajectory, and no
incoming missiles had been reported by the Iranian system of intercept
radars with longer-range vision.
There are reports from the IRGC that
communications “jamming” was experienced, this could have been
intentional, to eliminate access to contradictory information. I
personally do not believe the crew was alert and watching their screens
because there is no possible confusion between a very high-speed high
angle incoming cruise missile and a very slow speed low angle commercial
aircraft limping back to its point of origin.
03- Two missiles appear to have been fired, not one.
The first took out one of the two engines. A similar aircraft
successfully landed once before, in Baghdad, after precisely the same
mishap. A second missile was launched, perhaps also automatically (if
the crew was smoking all of this would have happened in 8 to ten seconds
before they could scramble back into their places and shut down the
system), and this is what brought the aircraft down. The Tor-M1 has
eight missiles, if it was on auto and the crew was outside the vehicle,
this was done and over before they realized what was happening.
04- Alternatively, the aircraft could have been driven into the ground via remote piloting.
Normally aircraft with full loads of fuel do not land, they circle the
airport for four hours or so to burn off enough fuel to be light enough
to land without additional hazard.
Blogger's note:
subterrnews.blogspot.com does not send cookies, or collect any information on
those using the blog. However, the blogspot is on google, and google may
collect information, and send cookies. Many of the links that we
connect to do not send out cookies or collect information, but some do.
You are keying in to this blog, and you have agreed to this.
The views expressed in the articles
do not necessarily represent the opinions of this blog. They are the views, and opinions of the
author(s) of the article.
0 comments:
Post a Comment