120000 children DIED from covid vaxx CDC ADMITS!!
September 16, 2023
Richie from Boston
Showing posts with label Admission. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Admission. Show all posts
Sunday, September 17, 2023
Tuesday, June 8, 2021
Pope Francis Admits to Deceiving Followers, Promoting Mark of the Beast, Blackmailing World Leaders
Pope Francis Admits to Deceiving Followers, Promoting Mark of the Beast, Blackmailing World Leaders
Monday, June 7, 2021 1:29
Last Sat. 5 June Pope Francis openly admitted that his push for a One World Religion was a way to put followers under his control and stamp them with the Mark of the Beast. Francis said he has kept secrets and deceived followers for a long time while promoting a secret agenda of the New World Order. Now was the End Times and he needed to tell the truth. He asked that people read the Bible and find God for themselves through it’s teachings rather than teaching their children to worship him. https://m.tiktok.com/v/6970413388279106821.html
The admission should come as no surprise to victims of Vatican crimes that included preventing excavation and investigation of 34 child mass grave sites across Canada wherein was thought to contain the mutilated remains of over 60,000 native children; blackmailing world leaders; the Vatican Bank used as a money laundering center for the Satanic Ninth Circle Child Sacrifice Cult, and their child trafficking, pedophile and drug running networks. All were pointed out in this 2019 article: Vatican No Longer Blackmails World Leaders, Though Do Child Sacrifice | Politics | Before It’s News (beforeitsnews.com)
Back in 2019 over 6,000 Vatican bank accounts used to blackmail world leaders were closed – evidently against the wishes of Pope Francis. The Vatican Bank lost their status as a money-laundering center for the Satanic Ninth Circle Child Sacrifice Cult’s global human trafficking, pedophile, gun and drug running networks.
Since 1913 the Federal Reserve’s global financial system has funneled US Taxpayer dollars to the Queens Bank of London, to the Vatican Bank and on to Central Banks across the globe. That system would be defunct with the about-to-be-instigated transparent Quantum Computer global financial system of the BRICS Alliance (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South America). /v3/crime-all-stars/2019/2469804.html
Be the first to comment.
Blogger's note: subterrnews.blogspot.com does not send cookies, or collect any information on those using the blog. However, the blogspot is on google, and google may collect information, and send cookies. Many of the links that we connect to do not send out cookies or collect information, but some do. You are keying in to this blog, and you have agreed to this.
The views expressed in the articles do not necessarily represent the opinions of this blog. They are the views, and opinions of the author(s) of the article.
Sunday, March 8, 2020
CDC Admits in Federal Court It Does Not Have Studies to Support Claim ‘Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism’
Media will likely ignore this bombshell admission and continue to demonize anti-vaxxers
Image Credits: natural news.
The Center for Disease Control admitted in a federal lawsuit
that is has no scientific studies to support its claim that vaccines
given to infants don’t cause autism.The lawsuit, filed by the non-profit Informed Consent Action Network, sought for the CDC to present evidence to back up the claim on its official website that “Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism.”
From ICAN’s press release:
The CDC claims on its website that “Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism.” Despite this claim, studies have found between 40% and 70% of parents with an autistic child continue to blame vaccines for their child’s autism, typically pointing to vaccines given during the first six months of life.
In the summer of 2019, ICAN submitted a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to the CDC for “All studies relied upon by CDC to claim that the DTaP vaccine does not cause autism.”
Despite months of demands, the CDC failed to produce a single study in response to these FOIA requests.
ICAN was therefore forced to sue the CDC in federal court, where the CDC finally conceded, in a stipulation signed by a Federal court judge, that it has no studies to support that any of these vaccines do not cause autism.
Del Bigtree, the founder of ICAN, explains the lawsuit in further detail below:
Read more & videos
Blogger's note:
subterrnews.blogspot.com does not send cookies, or collect any information on
those using the blog. However, the blogspot is on google, and google may
collect information, and send cookies. Many of the links that we
connect to do not send out cookies or collect information, but some do.
You are keying in to this blog, and you have agreed to this.
The views expressed in the articles
do not necessarily represent the opinions of this blog. They are the views, and opinions of the
author(s) of the article.
Friday, October 23, 2015
Hillary Clinton Admits She Broke U.S. Law in Benghazi
Saul Loeb/AFP/Getty Images
Hillary Clinton admitted to the House Select Committee on Benghazi on Thursday evening that she broke the law in handling security for the U.S. consulate there.
Under patient but persistent questioning from , Clinton admitted that she had not signed a waiver for security arrangements on the site, as required by the Secure Embassy Construction and Counterterrorism Act of 1999 (SECCA), 22 USC § 4865 2(B)(ii).Clinton admitted failing to comply with the law in the following exchange:
Brooks: But I have to ask you, if you’re familiar with the facts that in the wake of the 1998 bombing attacks in Nairobi and Dar-es-Salaam, Congress passed something referred to as the SECCA, the Secure Embassy Construction and Counterterrorism Act, which requires the Secretary of State to issue a waiver under two conditions: if the U.S. government personnel work in separate facilities, or if U.S. oversees facilities do not meet the security setback distances specified by the Bureau of Diplomatic Security. The law specifies that only the Secretary of State may sign these waivers, and that requirement is not to be delegated. Was a waiver issued for the temporary mission in Benghazi and the CIA annex, after the temporary mission compound was authorized through december of 2012? And did you sign that waiver, Madam Secretary?The relevant section of the law is below. Note that there is no exemption for “temporary” facilities, as Clinton incorrectly suggests.
Clinton: I think that the, the CIA annex I had no responsibility for. So I cannot speak to what the decisions were with respect to the CIA annex. That is something i know other committees have–
Brooks: But you acknowledge you were responsible for the temporary mission compound.
Clinton: Yes, of course. But you put them together. I just wanted to clarify that I had no responsibility for the CIA annex, obviously. The compound in Benghazi was neither an embassy nor a consulate. Those are the only two facilities for which we would obtain a formal diplomatic notification. And those were the only kinds of facilities that we would have sought waivers for at the time, because we were trying to–as has been testified to earlier–understand whether we were going to have a permanent mission or not. That means you have to survey available facilities, try to find a secure facility. and the standards that are set by the interagency Overseas Security Policy Board are the goals we try to drive for. But it is, it is very difficult, if not impossible, to do that in the immediate aftermath of a conflict situation. The temporary mission in Benghazi was set up to try to find out what was going on in the area, to work with the CIA where appropriate, and to make a decision as to whether there would be a permanent facility. So we could not have met the goals under the Overseas Security Policy Board. Nor could we have issued a waiver because we had to set up operations in order to make the assessments as to whether or not we would have a permanent mission, whether that mission would remain open. We made extensive and comprehensive improvements to the physical security, which I mentioned before.
Brooks: Madam Secretary, thank you. So it is obvious that a waiver was not signed, and you’ve given a defense as to why a waiver was not signed, and it was temporary because it was made up. It was something different. The compound had never become official. And so, therefore, you did not sign a waiver. Which, when most of our people are stationed in such dangerous places–let me get into that, with respect to the dangerous places–we know that Libya , you’ve testified before, was incapable of providing host nation support. And that involves protecting our diplomats and other U.S. government officials who travel there. So if the Libyan people didn’t have a government capable of providing security, and we didn’t have U.S. military in Libya, then we have two options: we either leave when it gets too dangerous, or the State Department makes sure that they provide that protection.
(2) Site selectionNote: Updated to correct the date.
(A) In general
In selecting a site for any new United States diplomatic facility abroad, the Secretary shall ensure that all United States Government personnel at the post (except those under the command of an area military commander) will be located on the site.
(B) Waiver authority
(i) In general Subject to clause (ii), the Secretary of State may waive subparagraph (A) if the Secretary, together with the head of each agency employing personnel that would not be located at the site, determine that security considerations permit and it is in the national interest of the United States.
(ii) Chancery or consulate building
(I) Authority not delegable The Secretary may not delegate the waiver authority under clause (i) with respect to a chancery or consulate building.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)