H.R. 8610 - Counter-UAS Authority, Security, Safety, and Reauthorization Act

 

Blogger's note:  TPTB always have more than one reason for a LIHOP, or MIHOP, but this may very well be near the top of their list.  The drones are also a psyop, and they want to instill fear and hysteria in the masses.  Senator Cory Booker tried to look nervous and scared in his initial Hollywood display of his concern.  Cory it was far from an Oscar.  Any intelligent person could clearly see that you were acting, and acting poorly.

Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for more

Tedros Talks with forked Tongue. Here's the evidence.

Let's look at a few things he told Agence France Press and The Guardian. What does the draft treaty really say?

Meryl Nass Jan 25

READ IN APP

I have come to love making powerpoint slides, as they seem to convey ideas better than I can do in just words. You get the idea from the Guardian’s photo and text that Tedros is troubled. Will the treaty (aka agreement) (aka accord) pass?

The powers behind the WHO throne knew they could only win if they could outsmart us. And they had the ability to pay for the world’s finest sociopathic lawyers. They had to sneak the bad stuff past us.

1. One way of doing that is to deny it exists.

2. Another is to misrepresent what their proposed documents show.

3. Yet another method is to include contradictory passages in the treaty, and refer back to one claim, without revealing that the opposite claim is also embedded in the treaty.

4. Another method runs through everything the WHO does. Financial guru Max Keiser coined the perfect term for this: Complexification. Deliberately complicate things so they are very hard to unravel and understand. The two WHO documents are completely different, treated differently, yet have many overlapping provisions. It is extremely difficult to keep them straight in your head. And their use of language is deliberately confusing. Tedros routinely claims that one document does not say “X,” when it is the other document that says “X”.

Here is the Guardian article. Let’s look at some of the tricks pulled in just one article.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/jan/22/global-pandemic-agreement-at-risk-of-falling-apart-who-warns

1. Make it about the children, always. “Plans for a global pandemic preparedness agreement risk falling apart amid wrangling and disinformation, according to the chief of the World Health Organization, who has warned that future generations “may not forgive us”.

2. Projection. Accuse the other side of doing what you are doing, i.e., spreading lies and disinformation.

3. Conflate two very different things. “Tedros said all countries needed the capacity to detect and share pathogens presenting a risk, and timely access to tests, treatments and vaccines.” What he fails to admit is that the treaty and amendments want nations to go out and find potential pandemic pathogens (aka biological warfare agents) all the time, not just during pandemics, and give them to the WHO for wider distribution. This is code for proliferation of biological weapons. If nations actually went along with this plan, I can virtually guarantee hundreds of lab leaks and possibly deliberate biological attacks with these agents.

   Sharing biowarfare agents is very different than timely access to tests and treatments.

4. Use code, and make it about the children. “He called for a “strong agreement that will help to protect our children and grandchildren from future pandemics”.’ The word strong in this coded context means enforceable. Nations will be obligated to obey the WHO. They must be accountable and compliant, according to the treaty draft.

5. Lie outright, and when challenged, show the claim in the treaty that nations are to remain sovereign, and hide the parts of the treaty that show that nations must cede sovereignty to the WHO.

6. Claim universal agreement with the treaty. “The WHO emergencies director, Michael Ryan, reminded countries how the pandemic “ripped apart our social, economic and political systems and became a multi-trillion dollar problem”.

   In the midst of major geopolitical conflicts, “this is one thing the world agrees on”, he said.”

What is sovereignty? The ability to rule yourself. If you allow someone else to rule you, in whole or part, you are ceding sovereignty over whatever it is they can command.

Let’s look at page 20 of the treaty for an example of how sovereignty is to be lost. The WHO requires nations to pass certain laws, using the word shall, which in legal language, in international treaties, means MUST.

Article 14 paragraph 1 tells nations they must expedite approvals (i.e., licenses) and authorizations (i.e., EUAs) of pandemic drugs and vaccines. Decoding this, it means nations need to find ways to get drugs and vaccines into their populations without going through full testing and licensing. In the US, an EUA can be issued without testing the product in even one experimental animal.

Article 14 paragraph 5 tells nations they must have laws and regulations in place to push pandemic drugs and vaccines out quickly.

Article 15 paragraph 1 tells nations they must “manage” liability for these hastily produced pandemic drugs and vaccines. Decoded, this means that manufacturers, WHO and government officials must be held harmless for injuries from the hastily made products that WHO will help produce.

Does it seem like nations are retaining control of the approval processes for pandemic products? Are they in control of the liability provisions? The WHO is telling them what they must do. Nations are expected to follow the WHO’s orders if they sign on to the treaty and/or amendments. However, because nations are told they themselves must pass such laws, the WHO claims the nations have retained sovereignty.

And WHO says so with its forked tongue in Article 3, paragraph 2:

Sovereignty – States have, in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations and the general principles of international law, the sovereign right to legislate and to implement legislation in pursuance of their health policies.

What do you think? Is WHO trying to pull a fast one, or not?

You're currently a free subscriber to Meryl’s COVID Newsletter. For the full experience, upgrade your subscription.

Upgrade to paid

CV UNMASKED Part 4: The Solution

COVID UNMASKED Part 4: The Solution

TOPICS:ConstitutionCovid-19HealthcareNeenah Payne

September 15, 2023

By Neenah Payne

COVID UNMASKED is a 4-part documentary. Part I: The Problem began airing on 9/11. Part 2: COVID, INC. began airing on 9/12. Part 3: The Big Picture began broadcasting on 9/13. Part 4: The Solution became available on 9/14. The films are available in English, Spanish, German, French, Italian, and Portuguese.

See the following reviews.

• Part 1: Film “COVID Unmasked: 2020 and Beyond” – 9/11-14
• Part 2: COVID Unmasked: Part II “COVID, Inc.”
• Part 3: COVID Unmasked Part 3: The Big Picture

NY Times: For Autocrats, and Others, Coronavirus Is a Chance to Grab Even More Power 3/30/20

Leaders around the world have passed emergency decrees and legislation expanding their reach during the pandemic. Will they ever relinquish them?

The US Constitution set up three branches of government: Legislative, Executive, and Judicial. The role of the press is to serve as the Fourth Estate and speak truth to power. Unfortunately, the corporate media (much of it now “Brought to you by Pfizer”) has failed in that role. While US Presidents, many governors, and mayors have egregiously violated the US Constitution, the courts have often helped hold the line during the COVID era in a number of key cases.

Chiefs of Police are usually municipal employees who owe their allegiance to a city. A Sheriff is generally (but not always) the highest, usually elected, law-enforcement officer of a county. Sheriffs are often elected by their constituents and are freer to hold the government to account. Wikipedia says:

Of the 50 U.S. states, 48 have sheriffs. The two exceptions are Alaska, which does not have counties, and Connecticut, which replaced its county sheriff system with the state and judicial marshals in 2000. Washington, D.C.

Sheriffs Defend US and State Constitutions

Part 4: The Solution shows that in many states, sheriffs have stood up to protect the US Constitution, the state constitution, and the rights of citizens from overreach by the state and national governments.

The documentary features former Sheriff Richard Mack of Graham County, Arizona. Mack is the founder of the Constitutional Sheriffs & Peace Officers Association (CSPOA) which educates citizens, sheriffs, and other peace officers about the Constitution. In 1994, Mack and six sheriffs from across the country challenged the constitutionality of the Brady Bill which required them to run background checks. They won a landmark decision in the US Supreme Court based on the Tenth Amendment of the Constitution.

Government Has No Authority to Make Us Wear Masks! (Sheriff Richard Mack) 3/1/21

Read more & videos 

Source: https://www.activistpost.com/2023/09/covid-unmasked-part-4-the-solution.html 

 

Australia is poised to legislate away the largest foundation stone of democracy.

The right, no, obligation, to criticize religious authority.

Submitted by IWB, on August 17th, 2016

 

 

1.) UN Resolution 16/18 made manifest in Australia:

 

 

 

2.) Andrew Bolt weighs in on these and similar events:

 

 

 

3.) Video blogger, Regressive News, takes a swing at all this.

 

 

 

RACIAL DISCRIMINATION ACT 1975 – SECT 18C

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/rda1975202/s18c.html

Here is a link to the document, itself.

Resolution 16-18

http://geneva.usmission.gov/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Resolution16-18.pdf

“Pakistan (on behalf of the Organization of the Islamic Conference): draft resolution
16/…

Combating intolerance, negative stereotyping and stigmatization
of, and discrimination, incitement to violence, and violence
against persons based on religion or belief”

In other words, you cannot criticize Islam; according to the UN.

In 1949,Lord Denning made a report into the blasphemy laws that were still on the UK statute books and as a result of this,they were removed by the 1960’s. They had barely been implemented since the early 1800’s.

Now look at us. All across the Western democracies blasphemy laws are being reintroduced courtesy of Islam and the millions of its soldiers that are being imported to enforce those new laws with our own police,judiciary and public sector backing them up with propaganda,legislation and brute force.

This is going to be about as big a constitutional crisis in the former democracies as it is possible to have,it’s total subversion of our legal systems.

 

 

FTB

Does Obama Have Legal Right to Defend Syrian Rebels With Air Force? State Dept. Can’t Answer
By RT
 

“I frankly don’t know what the legal authority is,” Toner said, adding that the situation in Syria remains “complex and fluid.”

Critics are questioning what exact authority the White House has to go ahead with the mission after minimal consultation with the UN Security Council?

Posted August 06, 2015

 

Click for Spanish, German, Dutch, Danish, French, translation- Note- Translation may take a moment to load.