THE GLOBAL CENSORSHIP RACKET! - Australia Bans Independent Research! From Hate Speech To Technocracy

Video 

World Alternative Media

Apr 21, 2024

Josh Sigurdson reports on the global normalization of censorship for the purpose of getting everyone to bow to a technocratic censorship racket which surveils all people and punishes "wrongthink" by withholding people's money and restricting food rations. Following the Sydney church stabbing of Bishop Mar Mari Emanuel, the Australian police made it clear that no one is to share or read information that doesn't come directly from the police. Research is considered off limits. Guilt by association is the norm. Of course punishing those targeting Christians in Australia and New Zealand is off the table, but questioning the narrative surrounding the attacks is "dangerous" according to the government. This is the epitome of Orwellian doublethink and it's meant to divide the public. It is also meant as a litmus test for future technocratic censorship. Canada has banned news from being shared on Facebook. The narrative is set by the state run media. Scotland has pushed forward hate speech legislations that could lead to 7 years in prison if you "insult" a trans person. A law that has been harshly and rightly criticized by Harry Potter author JK Rowling. The Brazilian government is banning Twitter/X (a psyop in itself as Twitter continues to gather people's information, build a social credit system, register itself as a bank and censor people). Australia is also telling Twitter/X that it must censor stories regarding the stabbings or face 750,000 Australian dollars in fines each day. ChatGPT is being trained to only parrot mainstream talking points. Canada is releasing a social credit system. The federal government is making Google hand over any search histories that involve watching "the wrong thing" on YouTube which is entirely vague. Germany's interior minister is saying anyone who donates to a so-called "far right wing organization" should be surveilled at all times. Nigeria is launching a full scale national ID, much like Bill Gates' and the United Nation's digital ID in Sierra Leone as we previously reported. Kenya launched a carbon credit score that is already restricting thousands from buying food. If it isn't blatantly obvious at this point that the censorship we are seeing will inevitably lead to a dystopian technocratic environment with 15 Minute Cities, digital IDs, social credit, carbon credits, CBDCs and food rations, people aren't paying attention! Meanwhile, though people are leaving the mainstream media in droves, people are turning to as David Icke calls it, "Mainstream Alternative Media" which is further promoting an opposing narrative which perpetuates the slumber. These medias self censor and keep people in fear for fears and money while a small few independent medias (we'd like to believe we're one of them) provides the real news unfettered and without caring who we offend as well as provide solutions to these very real psychological operations. In this video, we break down where this is all leading and what can be done about it.

Stay tuned for more from WAM!

 

 

Newsom Bans Singing In Houses Of Worship After Downplaying Spread Of Coronavirus At Protests

by News Kick3 hours ago   in News 0 comments

Gov. Gavin Newsom (D-CA) has issued new restrictions limiting the reopening of the economy in nearly 20 counties across the Golden State. One of the more controversial measures introduced Thursday will ban singing and chanting at houses of worships, which are already restricted to allowing 25% of guests or just 100 worshippers (whichever is lower). The Sacramento Bee reported that in late May, Newsom simply encouraged houses of worship to “strongly consider discontinuing singing, group recitation, and other practices and performances

Video

Blogger's note:  subterrnews.blogspot.com does not send cookies, or collect any information on those using the blog.  However, the blogspot is on google, and google may collect information, and send cookies.  Many of the links that  we connect to do not send out cookies or collect information, but some do.  You are keying in to this blog, and you have agreed to this.

The views expressed in the articles do not necessarily represent the opinions of this blog.  They are the views, and opinions of the author(s) of the article.

Obama Bans Gold Ownership

 by “United States Citizens”? So Who’s a “United States Citizen”? – Judge Anna von Reitz

Thursday, July 28, 2016 1:19

(Before It's News)

July 28, 2016

 

Those of you who have been following along for some time know that the United States is not America and that “United States Citizens” are not Americans. Chances are high that if you are an average Bread and Butter American you are not a “United States Citizen” and probably never were.

A “citizen” is obligated to serve the government. A “national” is one of those that the government serves.

The Definitive Treaty of Peace 1783 that ended the Revolutionary War described the “citizens” as “Inhabitants” — British subjects left here to provide “essential government services” and the state nationals were described as “the free, sovereign, and independent people of the United States.”

Which one are you?

“Citizen” = British subject, an inhabitant “residing” here, for the purpose of providing essential government services (Article IV) and by definition these “United States Citizens” are all foreign with respect to us and to our organic states, just as we are foreign with respect to them.

Thus, while you, a man born in Wisconsin, serves in the military, you are considered a “United States Citizen”— but when you are discharged you are no longer in that political status. You are by nature and right a Wisconsinite and an American State National, owing no obligation to serve any governmental function at all.

You are not naturally a “United States Citzen” nor a “citizen of the United States” nor are you a State Citizen unless you hold a public office in the government of one of the organic states of the Union.

The truth is that though the Federales and employees of the federalized States of States corporate franchises routinely impose upon us and presume that we are “United States Citizens” instead of being American State Nationals, the fact remains that:

1. None of us who were born here went through any Naturalization process as required by the Naturalization Act, Seventh Congress, Session 1, Chapter 28, Sections 1-4 to become “United States Citizens”.

2. The only people here who really are “United States Citizens” are (a) those born in the District of Columbia, Guam, Puerto Rico or what we consider the “Territories and Possessions”; (b) federal civilian employees; (c) federal military personnel on active duty; (d) federal welfare recipients; (e) elected officers of the federal and federalized “state of state” corporations; (f) political asylum seekers; (g) African Americans who were never accorded their State National status and then, there are the “citizens of the United States” which are all (h) federal corporations.

It is this last grouping that causes all the trouble, because to benefit themselves the foreign United States, Inc. has busily created “franchises” for itself and named these THINGS after you.

Thus, there is an “international organization” calling itself by your name FIRST MIDDLE LAST and a public transmitting utility calling itself by your name FIRST MIDDLE-INITIAL LAST and both these legal fiction entities are “citizens of the United States” under the so-called “diversity of citizenship” clause the rats in Congress gratuitously granted themselves without your knowledge or permission.

They have been infringing upon the copyright of your name all your life, indebting you, prosecuting you for collection of their own debts, conferring the slave status of “citizen of the United States” on you —- their actual employers — all without your knowledge or consent. They have done this via an undisclosed surreptitious process of “registration” of your given names that happened while you were all still babies in your cradles.

Now there are some things you should know about these fictional incorporated “citizens of the United States”—- they are all bad characters. They are bankrupt most of the time, engaged in shady dealings— rum manufacturing, drug trade, firearms manufacturing that sort of thing—- and when they are charged with anything in court they are guilty by definition.

Oh, and they are also all slaves by definition and unable to own any property.

So, if you want to own any private property at all, much less gold or silver, it is absolutely essential that you understand these definitions and conventions which have been “assumed” about you and your “voluntary” political status as a “citizen of the United States” or as a “United States Citizen”.

Mr. Obama, like FDR before him, is trying to shore up these despicable presumptions upon the American people and prevent a collapse of the “United States Dollar”—- which, as you have guessed by now, isn’t American either.

Their “United States Dollar”—- a piece of paper with the “good faith of Congress” as its backing—- has been deliberately confused with our “United States Dollar” which is an amount of fine silver.

Time to wake up, Campers.

It is past time to notice what the “good faith” of the “United States Congress” has been worth for the last 150 years and note that these infernal scoundrels have been stealing us blind, maliciously infringing on our copyrights and trademarks, practicing identity theft and personage against us, arresting us under false pretenses, collecting taxes from us that we don’t owe, and other criminal acts too numerous to mention—-and doing all this while taking their paychecks from our pockets.

Mr. Obama says that “United States Citizens” living anywhere in the world can’t own gold. Mr. Obama says that “United States Citizens” are subject to indefinite detainment. Mr. Obama says that “United States Citizens” have to buy their health insurance from him and his flunkies. Mr. Obama says that “United States Citizens” have to…… spread their legs wider?

Please join me in saying, “Hell, no, Mr. Obama, I’m not a “United States Citizen” and you aren’t the Emperor of China, either. You are just an undeclared Foreign Agent here on my soil and on my payroll to provide me with essential governmental services and doing a piss poor job of it.”

Remember who you are. Remember who employs who. And make it stick.

If Obama sends any revenue agents around to collect your gold and they enter your private property and attempt to bully you after you have plainly stated that you are not acting as a “United States Citizen” just ask them to prove that you are one? Where is there any evidence at all that you ever complied with the Naturalization Act?

To see more articles by Judge Anna please visit her website at www.annavonreitz.com

Submitted by:  Wynter Moon

Hungary PM Viktor Orban Says

Hungary PM Viktor Orban Says Constitution BANS “Islamization” Of Country

Hungary's heroic prime minister Viktor Orban has just made clear he will not tolerate the Islamization of his peoples' country, proclaiming their constitution forbids it.

Information Liberation | Chris Menahan - April 27, 2016

 

 

Hungary’s heroic prime minister Viktor Orban has just made clear he will not tolerate the Islamization of his peoples’ country, proclaiming their constitution forbids it.  

From the AP:

Hungary’s constitution bans “Islamization” because the document aims to protect Hungarian language and culture, Prime Minister Viktor Orban said Monday.

Orban also said the constitution forces the government to oppose any kind of mass migration that would endanger those principles.

“To be clear and unequivocal, I can say that Islamization is constitutionally banned in Hungary,” Orban said in parliament at an event celebrating the fifth anniversary of Hungary’s new constitution, now known as the Basic Law.

Orban was quoting from the National Avowal, the Basic Law’s preamble, which details the country’s commitment “to promoting and safeguarding our heritage, our unique language, Hungarian culture” and the protection of “the living conditions of future generations.”

Hungary maintains that the migrant issue is a matter of national sovereignty.

“We have the right to choose whom we want and don’t want to live with,” Orban said.

Hungary has built razor-wire fences on its southern borders to stop migrants from passing through to other European nations. Orban has said he wants “zero” migrants in the East European nation.

Before the fences, nearly 400,000 migrants entered Hungary in 2015 on their way to richer nations in Western Europe.

Hungary was getting some 7,000 migrants a day invading their country before constructing a large fence–their own mini Trump-Wall as it were–after construction was completed the numbers fell to almost nothing.

Orban has previously taken the boldest stance of all the leaders in Europe by proclaiming outright EU globalists are trying to destroy European nation-states through the mass importation of hostile migrants.

Yesterday we covered how ex-US diplomat Adam Topolansky predicted indigenous Europeans will begin fleeing to Hungary in the coming years to escape their own nations’ “suicidal migration policies.”

http://subterrnews.blogspot.com/2016/04/hungary-pm-viktor-orban-says.html

Oh La La! France Bans Buying Sex, Prostitutes Take to the Streets

© AFP 2016/ FRANCOIS GUILLOT

Europe

17:01 07.04.2016(updated 18:51 07.04.2016) Get short URL

6121852

French MPs have given the green light to a law that allows the authorities to fine the clients of prostitutes, according to media reports.

© Sputnik/

'Night Men': Male Prostitutes Roam the Streets in Egypt

A controversial law that makes it illegal to pay for sex has been passed by French lawmakers; the law imposes fines of up to 3,750 euros (4,270 dollars) on prostitutes' clients and mandates that they attend classes on "the harms of prostitution."

Socialist lawmaker Maud Olivier, a feminist who added significantly to the adoption of the bill, was quoted by the news agency AFP as saying that the law is part of measures aimed at tackling prostitution.

"This law is essential to ending the idea that it is normal to buy someone's body. We will succeed in changing the mentality, but new efforts are needed to raise awareness, to train police officers and magistrates," Olivier said.

During the final debate on the bill, about 60 sex workers staged a protest rally outside a parliament building, news reports said, adding that the law is expected to affect the livelihoods of at least 30,000 prostitutes in France.

 

sonja dolinsek‏@sonjdol 20h20 hours ago

France gave in to the conservative demands to penalize paying for sex. The French government will earn 1500€ from clients. Just like a pimp.

• Retweets 4
• Likes 2

​

Some protesters carried banners reading "Don't liberate me, I'll take care of myself!" Another poster read "Sex work is work."

© AP Photo/ Felipe Dana

US Navy Officer Sentenced for Selling Classified Data for Cash, Prostitutes

Under the new law, clients caught paying prostitutes for sex will be fined 1,500 euros, which will rise to 3,750 euros for repeat offenders. The law has been on the table since December 2013, when it was first submitted to the French parliament.

Sweden became the first country in the world to announce in 1999 that it would punish people for buying sex rather than selling it, in a move to avoid criminalizing the victims of sex trafficking. Norway, Iceland and Northern Ireland have also adopted this model and the European parliament has approved a resolution calling for the law to be adopted throughout the continent.

Read more: http://sputniknews.com/europe/20160407/1037644144/france-prostitutes-clients-law.html#ixzz459oX8iiF

 

http://subterrnews.blogspot.com/2016/04/oh-la-la-france-bans-buying-sex.html

 

Blogger's Note:  Ted Cruz will not like that.

Politically Correct School Bans Huckleberry Finn – the Mark Twain Classic That Critiqued Slavery – For Use of the “N” Word

December 15, 2015 | Melissa Dykes | The Daily Sheeple | 

Wow. Just when you began to wonder how the politically correct agenda could get any more pathetic than calling Star Wars racist because Darth Vader is black, its purveyors go and aspire.
That’s right. History is being rewritten left and right to avoid hurting anyone’s feelings in this country.
Now a school in Philadelphia recently announced that it was removing Huckleberry Finn, the Mark Twain novel written in 1885 that ranks as one of the all-time great American novels ever, from its classroom curriculum…
Because the book dares, in its historical accuracy, to include use of the “N” word.
Of course, the book is poignantly ahead of its time in its critique of slavery, and depicts a boy who befriends a slave and goes through many difficulties to help him reach freedom…
But the truth stopped mattering a long time ago in politically correct America.
As the NY Post reported, “The Politically Correct Crowd Just Got a Great American Novel Banned“:

A suburban Philadelphia school expelled “Adventures of Huckleberry Finn” from its curriculum over the book’s overuse of the N-word.
The Friends’ Central School removed the Mark Twain classic from the 11th-grade American literature class last week after students said it made them feel uncomfortable, the Philadelphia Inquirer reported.
“We have all come to the conclusion that the community costs of reading this book in 11th grade outweigh the literary benefits,” principal Art Hall said in a letter to parents.
Hall said students were challenged by the use of the racial slur, and felt the school was not being inclusive enough…

Yes. Because not being “inclusive” by “challenging” students with reality is bad. Because we mustn’t hurt anyone’s feelings ever, all students must have a censored version of history spoonfed to them.
Continuing:

Deborah Caldwell-Stone, deputy director of the American Library Association’s Office for Intellectual Freedom, blasted the school’s action as an act of censorship.
“We would still see this as a kind of censorship because there is something to be learned from this work,” she told the Inquirer.
But the principal insisted it isn’t censorship.

Yes, it is, by definition, censorship. The fact that the principal doesn’t know what censorship is even while he is censoring something, well, that’s alarming in and of itself. But, really, this goes beyond mere censorship.
This is a politically correct agenda infecting our nation’s youth like a cancer with the ultimate goal of dumbing down future American adults into spineless, mindless drones without any critical thinking skills, strong convictions, or interest in standing up for their rights whatsoever.
The irony with banning this particular book for this reason is so thick, its painful. As commenter “Walter” pointed out:

A young white boy decides he’d rather go to hell than turn his black, runaway slave friend in. Let’s ban it because one of its words causes discomfort in some students and administrators. Twain would love the irony and cynically expect the idiocy. The book is the most powerful indictment of white racists ever written. It’s a shame some people never learn how to read, teach, or appreciate great literature.

Delivered by The Daily Sheeple

We encourage you to share and republish our reports, analyses, breaking news and videos (Click for details).

---

Contributed by Melissa Dykes of The Daily Sheeple.
Melissa Dykes is a writer, researcher, and analyst for The Daily Sheeple and a co-creator of Truthstream Media with Aaron Dykes, a site that offers teleprompter-free, unscripted analysis of The Matrix we find ourselves living in. Melissa also co-founded Nutritional Anarchy with Daisy Luther of The Organic Prepper, a site focused on resistance through food self-sufficiency. Wake the flock up!

http://www.thedailysheeple.com/politically-correct-school-bans-huckleberry-finn-the-mark-twain-classic-that-critiqued-slavery-for-use-of-the-n-word_122015

YouTube Police Bans Documentary Exposing Climate Change

THElNFOWARRlOR

 

 

Bank Of Ireland Bans “Small” Cash Withdrawals At Branches

Coins and notes are in fact an anachronism

Image Credits: 76657755@N04, flickr.

by Zero Hedge | November 5, 2015

 

As central planners the world over grapple with the effective “lower bound” that’s imposed by the existence of physical banknotes, there’s been no shortage of calls for a ban on cash.

Put simply, if you eliminate physical currency, you also eliminate the idea of a floor for depo rates.
After all, if people can’t withdraw paper money and stash it under the mattress, then interest rates can be as negative as the government wants them to be in order to “encourage” consumption. If, for instance, you’re being charged 10% for saving your money, then by God you will probably spend that money rather than see the bank collect a double-digit fee just for holding on to your paycheck.
In the absence of physical cash, there’s no way for depositors to avoid that rather unpalatable outcome unless the public starts buying hard assets like commodities with their debit cards. If you think that sounds far-fetched, just consider the fact that everyone from Citi’s Willem Buiter to economist Ken Rogoff to the German Council Of Economic Experts’ Peter Bofinger have now floated the idea.

“With today’s technical possibilities, coins and notes are in fact an anachronism,” Bofinger told Spiegel back in May. Now, in what should be a wake up call to the world, Bank of Ireland has banned branch withdrawals of less than €700.  Seriously. Here’s The Irish Times explaining that tellers will still assist the “elderly” if they have trouble using automated methods of obtaining cash:

Under new rules, designed to streamline in-branch services, Bank of Ireland said

 withdrawals of less than €700 will no longer be facilitated with the assistance of tellers.
  From mid-November, customers will have to use ATMs or mobile devices for small and modest-sized withdrawals.   Lodgements of up to €3,000 and those involving less than 15 cheques will also have to use the bank’s dedicated lodgement ATMs.   “Bank of Ireland understands these changes may be a new way of banking for some of our customers, and the branch teams will be available to help and guide them through this change,” the bank said in a statement.
So, if you are, i) wanting less than €700, ii) have less than 15 checks to deposit, or iii) aren’t looking to put at least €3,000 into your account, you are no longer welcome inside Bank of Ireland branches. For his part, Irish Finance Minister Michael Noonan seems to think that this is, for lack of a better description, absolutely nuts:

Minister for Finance Michael Noonan has described restrictions to be imposed by Bank of Ireland on over-the-counter lodgements and withdrawals as both “surprising and unnecessary”.   “I expect the bank to fully honour this commitment and ensure that customers will be facilitated through the existing arrangements where required. I would welcome a clarification form Bank of Ireland on the issue,” he said in a statement.

Yes, Noonan is demanding some “clarification,” and you should too, before you discover that the world’s central bankers planners have absconded with your physical cash on the way to instituting a regime that will allow for the micromanagement of your purchasing decisions.