New Zealand whistleblower who courageously exposed data on COVID vaccines killing citizens now faces a 7 year prison sentence

12/10/2023 // Lance D Johnson

 

A New Zealand whistleblower, who exposed the mortality rate from individual COVID-19 vaccine lots, was arrested and faces an aggressive government retribution scheme that seeks to silence and punish him.

Journalist Liz Gunn was first to interview the whistleblower, whose name is Barry Young. He worked for the New Zealand government and had access to vaccine-related data from providers across the country. When he noticed that people were dying after vaccination, he decided to publicize the data.

This act of bravery has been met with cruel acts of totalitarianism. The Young's home has been raided by police; he has been arrested; and the New Zealand government forced an injunction that “prevents any publication of the data.” The Employment Relations Authority of New Zealand also reports that Barry Young has had all of his access to the projects system removed. He now faces a 7 year prison sentence. As of December 3rd, journalist Liz Gunn is sounding the alarm, calling for a “global effort” to get this story out.

New Zealand government trying to coverup crimes against humanity from COVID-19 vaccines

During the rollout of COVID-19 vaccines and medical tyranny, the government of New Zealand established a public health agency called Te Whatu Ora. On July 1, 2022, this agency replaced the country’s 20 district health boards (DHBs), effectively nationalizing management of healthcare services in New Zealand. The new agency consolidates the DHB’s combined work force of 80,000, and is allotted an annual operating budget of NZ $20?billion.

While the Ministry of Health sets health policy, strategy, and regulation, Te Whatu Ora is tasked with things like providing a vaccine payment system for medical providers across the country.

These agencies have immense power over people's lives, are financially tied to the corruption inside the pharmaceutical industry, and provide a revolving door between government regulators, policy makers, and an unaccountable vaccine industry. Could this new government agency be running a coverup operation for the vaccine industry, as they injure and kill untold numbers of people with so-called safe and effective vaccines?

New Zealand government goes after courageous whistleblower

Whistleblower Barry Young disclosed government data on individual vaccine lots. According to the data, a shocking proportion of individuals have died shortly after receiving a COVID-19 vaccine. After going public with the data, the New Zealand government raided his home. Young now faces a seven-year prison sentence for exposing the mortality data after COVID-19 vaccination taken directly from Te Whatu Ora.

Young broke down the data according to vaccine batch. Most of the batches studied were from Pfizer. The first batch consisted of 711 vaccinated individuals. Young claims that 152 (21%) of these individuals died soon after taking the shots. Another healthcare provider administered 621 doses. Of those, 104 (17%) of the vaccinated individuals died soon thereafter. During his interview with Gunn, the whistleblower said, “This should never happen, the percentage who die from what would be a normal vaccination administration would be 0.75 percent.”

Barry was one of the architects of the system that tracked vaccine-related data for the government. When he recognized that people were dying a week after being vaccinated, he decided to download and share the data with the world. Instead of being honored for exposing these atrocities, Barry Young now faces a corrupt communist government that seeks to punish him for his honesty and courage.

The government is charging Young with accessing a government computer system for “dishonest purposes.” The corrupt prosecutors are accusing him of spreading “misinformation” and opposed his release on bail. He faces a seven year prison sentence for telling the truth.

Since the story got out, Barry was received supported in court and has been released from jail. In an interview after his release, Barry defended the data and said, "The government needs to listen to the people. What has happened is wrong...These things need to be looked at. They can put me in jail. They can cage me, but they can never cage the truth."

Sources include:

Expose-News.com

Rumble.com

Rumble.com 

Source:  https://www.naturalnews.com/2023-12-10-new-zealand-whistleblower-exposed-covid-vax-data-7-year-prison-sentence.html

 

CDC Data

CDC Data: COVID Vaccines Killed 61,000 Americans In Just Fall And Winter

Mac Slavo
March 17th, 2022
SHTFplan.com
Comments (13)

An analysis of figures from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) database revealed that 61,000 people, supposedly in the prime of their life, ages 25-44, died of vaccine-related causes in the U.S. in the fall and winter of 2021.

According to Edward Dowd, who is a former BlackRock portfolio manager, an investment adviser on Wall Street, and an insurance industry expert, the statistic was uncovered accidentally.  Dowd and part of his team stumbled upon the buried truth when, looking for something else, he broke down the CDC figures by age and created his own baseline death rates from there.

“Basically, you see that millennials experienced 84 percent excess death in the fall and winter of 2021. So excess deaths accelerated when mandates and boosters hit,” Dowd told Alex Jones. “And this age group is important because they’re healthy. And you can’t say that they, you know, miss their cancer screenings. This is ages 25 to 44. So this is just devastating evidence that the vaccines are causing this age group to die at an accelerating rate.”

“I know I showed percentages in that chart, but the actual bodies are 61,000. That’s the Vietnam War event that just occurred to the millennial generation – 58,000 died in the Vietnam War,” he added.

Dowd believes the vaccines are to blame because of the timing of the government’s mandates. “And then [President Joe] Biden came out [announcing the mandates]. And boosters were also authorized and started happening. So let’s call this what it is. This is death by government mandate or democide, death by government. That’s what’s going on here.”

Dowd is not the only one to notice deaths are excessive in the age of the “vaccines.”

Life Insurance Payouts Skyrocket 258% As Post-“Vaccine” Deaths Rapidly Accelerate

“Well, there’s two ways to look at this. Just good old-fashioned power and greed, or there was a plan hatched by some very evil people. I’m going with power and greed for now. But you know, as we roll through this very active fraud, it’s being exposed. There’s more and more evidence coming to the front that this is part of some sort of bigger grand plan.” –Edward Dowd

Dowd and his team are going to work hard and drop more charts after interpreting all of the CDC’s data, until the true reason why there were more deaths in 2021 than in 2020 is exposed. Citing more figures, Dowd said the over 65 generation saw 306,000 excess deaths in the second half of last year until February. “That is a World War II event,” explained Dowd, noting over 291,000 Americans died in the war. Dowd also pointed out that there are a little over 1.1 million people in excess deaths in the U.S. since the pandemic began, and most are AFTER the vaccines were rolled out.

 Source:  shtfplan.com

Be the first to Comment.

Blogger's note:  subterrnews.blogspot.com does not send cookies, or collect any information on those using the blog.  However, the blogspot is on google, and google may collect information, and send cookies.  Many of the links that  we connect to do not send out cookies or collect information, but some do.  You are keying in to this blog, and you have agreed to this.

The views of the author do not necessarily represent the opinions of this blog.  They are the views, and opinions of the author(s) of the article.

                                                                                                                                                                                             

 

New Harvard Data (Accidentally) Reveal How Lockdowns Crushed the Working Class While Leaving Elites Unscathed

The picture painted is one of working-class destruction.

Thursday, June 17, 2021

Image Credit: tracktherecovery.org

Brad Polumbo

News Briefs COVID-19 Lockdowns Harvard Employment

Founding father and the second president of the United States John Adams once said that “Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.” What he meant was that objective, raw numbers don’t lie—and this remains true hundreds of years later. 

We just got yet another example. A new data analysis from Harvard University, Brown University, and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation calculates how different employment levels have been impacted during the pandemic to date. The findings reveal that government lockdown orders devastated workers at the bottom of the financial food chain but left the upper-tier actually better off.

The analysis examined employment levels in January 2020, before the coronavirus spread widely and before lockdown orders and other restrictions on the economy were implemented. It compared them to employment figures from March 31, 2021.

The picture painted by this comparison is one of working-class destruction.

Employment for lower-wage workers, defined as earning less than $27,000 annually, declined by a whopping 23.6 percent over the time period. Employment for middle-wage workers, defined as earning from $27,000 to $60,000, declined by a modest 4.5 percent. However, employment for high-wage workers, defined as earning more than $60,000, actually increased 2.4 percent over the measured time period despite the country’s economic turmoil.

Image Credit: tracktherecovery.org

The data are damning. They offer yet another reminder that government lockdowns hurt most those who could least afford it. 

Some critics argue that the pandemic, not government lockdowns, are the true source of this economic duress. While there’s no doubt the virus itself played some role, government lockdowns were undoubtedly the single biggest factor. It’s pretty intuitive that ordering people not to patronize businesses and criminalizing peoples’ livelihoods would hurt the economy. This intuition is confirmed by data and studies showing as much. And don’t forget the fact that heavy lockdown states have consistently had much higher unemployment rates than states that took a more laissez-faire approach.

Others might insist that the mitigation of the spread of COVID-19 accomplished by lockdowns justifies this economic fallout. But this argument fails to account for the many peer-reviewed studies showing lockdown orders did not effectively slow the pandemic’s spread, or the painfully inconvenient fact that most COVID-19 spread occurred not in workplaces, restaurants, or gyms but at home. (Making “stay-at-home orders” seem like an astonishing mistake in hindsight.)  

So, all lockdowns really seem to have accomplished is at best a mild delay in the pandemic’s trajectory in exchange for a host of lethal unintended consequences such as a mental health crisis and skyrocketing drug overdoses. And, as we now know, a highly regressive economic fallout for the working class.

Of course, Ivy League researchers almost certainly did not intend to expose the failings of big government pandemic policies when they set out to catalog employment data. But, as Adams said, facts are stubborn things. 

Like this story? Click here to sign up for the FEE Daily and get free-market news and analysis like this from Policy Correspondent Brad Polumbo in your inbox every weekday. 

Brad Polumbo

Brad Polumbo (@Brad_Polumbo) is a libertarian-conservative journalist and Policy Correspondent at the Foundation for Economic Education.

Source:  https://fee.org/articles/new-harvard-data-accidentally-reveal-how-lockdowns-crushed-the-working-class-while-leaving-elites-unscathed/

Be the first to comment.

Blogger's note:  subterrnews.blogspot.com does not send cookies, or collect any information on those using the blog.  However, the blogspot is on google, and google may collect information, and send cookies.  Many of the links that  we connect to do not send out cookies or collect information, but some do.  You are keying in to this blog, and you have agreed to this.

The views expressed in the articles do not necessarily represent the opinions of this blog.  They are the views, and opinions of the author(s) of the article.

 

CDC Data Shows COVID Hasn’t Increased US Death Rate

Johns Hopkins Academic: CDC Data Shows COVID Hasn’t Increased US Death Rate

Sunday, November 29, 2020 11:33

“The data doesn’t show that older individuals are dying in a higher proportion to total deaths than usual. We also found evidence that Covid 19 death numbers were misleading.”

By Michael Haynes, November 29, 2020

 

JHU Advanced Academic Programs / Youtube screen grab

Using statistical analysis, a senior lecturer from Johns Hopkins University (JHU) has demonstrated that COVID-19 has resulted in no excess deaths, yet the university has censored the article online.

Dr. Genevieve Briand, the “Assistant Director for MS in Applied Economics,” gave a video lecture in which she examined the deaths due to COVID-19 and deaths overall in the U.S.

Her findings were compiled in an article in the JHU newsletter, penned by Yanni Gu, which has since been removed by the university. In a tweet, JHU stated that the article was deleted, because it “was being used to support false and dangerous inaccuracies about the impact of the pandemic. We regret that this article may have contributed to the spread of misinformation about COVID-19.”

In the lecture, using data drawn from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) website, Briand noted that the deaths of “older people stayed the same before and after COVID-19.” This finding was contrary to expectation: “Since COVID-19 mainly affects the elderly, experts expected an increase in the percentage of deaths in older age groups. However, this increase is not seen from the CDC data. In fact, the percentages of deaths among all age groups remain relatively the same.”

Presenting data from February to September, she noted that each week, before and after the impact of the virus, “an average of over 60,000 individuals die per week. So 50,000 to 70,000 deaths per week is normal, it is to be expected.” The latest weekly report from the CDC notes that in week 46 of 2020, only “1,260” had COVID–19 “listed as an underlying or contributing cause of death.”

Comparing deaths from 2014 to 2020, Briand then demonstrated that whilst the data recorded a slight spike in 2020, there were only 11,292 more deaths than 2018. Thus the COVID spike was found to be consistent with both seasonal and historical trends.

Taking 2018 as an example, Briand pointed out that “the pattern of seasonal increase in the total number of deaths is a result of the rise in deaths by all causes,” with “heart disease, respiratory diseases, influenza and pneumonia” being the three leading causes of death.

Yet when examining 2020’s data in the seasonal period, she found that “COVID-19-related deaths exceeded deaths from heart diseases,” which was unusual, since heart disease “has always prevailed as the leading cause of deaths.”

Comparing the 2020 figures to the corresponding period in 2018, they showed that in 2020, “instead of the expected drastic increase across all causes, there was a significant decrease in deaths due to heart disease. Even more surprising … this sudden decline in deaths is observed for all other causes.”

The JHU newsletter article stated that the “trend is completely contrary to the pattern observed in all previous years.”

It also observes that “the total decrease in deaths by other causes almost exactly equals the increase in deaths by COVID-19.”

Hence, according to Dr. Briand, “the COVID-19 death toll is misleading … deaths due to heart diseases, respiratory diseases, influenza and pneumonia may instead be recategorized as being due to COVID-19.”

In the weeks in April with the highest reported number of deaths, the rise in COVID deaths almost exactly mirrored the decrease in the leading causes of deaths.

Graph depicts the total decrease in deaths by various causes, including COVID-19. SOURCE: Courtesy of Genevieve Briand

She concluded with a number of summary statements: “By the CDC’s own account, in this pandemic, deaths of children have been less than in each of the last five flue seasons.”

“For three of the four weeks where COVID-19 deaths, where reported, have been higher than heart disease deaths, the number of deaths due to heart disease, influenza, and pneumonia, chronic respiratory disease and more, decreased,” she added.

“All this points to the reason we have a higher number of reported COVID-19 deaths among older individuals than younger individuals, is simply because every day in the U.S. older individuals die in higher numbers than younger individuals.”

Try This Discreet Weapon - They'll Never See It Coming Until They Are On The Ground and Can't Move!

Briand further commented: “The data doesn’t show that older individuals are dying in a higher proportion to total deaths than usual. We also found evidence that COVID-19 death numbers were misleading. We found evidence some deaths caused by diseases of the heart, chronic lower order respiratory diseases, flu and pneumonia, and more, were simply reclassified as COVID-19 deaths.”

The American Institute for Economic Research commented on the finding, saying that the “accounting error regarding Covid deaths … has caused mass hysteria and misinformed public policy. Closing down communities to fight a virus that according to the data, has had no significant contribution to total deaths, reduces our overall capacity to build a healthy society.”

“All of this points to no evidence that COVID-19 created any excess deaths. Total death numbers are not above normal death numbers. We found no evidence to the contrary,” Dr. Briand concluded.

Johns Hopkins academic: CDC data shows COVID hasn’t increased US death rate