• 🤯 NEW Mexico Flood & Hurricane HELENE...
RFB ON BITCHUTE WARGAMES https://www.bitchute.com/video/Ki9wK7...
/ nulookrefinish 
/ @richiefromboston27
Back in September, Democrat Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham of New Mexico basically tried to subvert the Second Amendment, by placing a suspension on concealed and open carry, prompting calls for her impeachment.
Now she is pushing a whole new set of gun control proposals.
It doesn’t matter how bad crime gets, Democrats continue to try to disarm law-abiding Americans.
FOX News reports:
Grisham just won’t back down.
Democrat Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham last Friday declared gun violence a public health emergency in response to the shooting deaths of a thirteen-year-old girl on July 28, a five-year-old girl on August 14, and an eleven-year-old boy on September 6.
“The action plan includes a suspension of open and concealed carry laws in Bernalillo County, temporarily prohibiting the carrying of guns on public property with certain exceptions. Exceptions include for licensed security guards and law enforcement officers. Citizens with permits to carry firearms are free to possess their weapons on private property (such as at a gun range or gun store), provided they transport the firearm in a locked box, use a trigger lock, or some other mechanism that renders the gun incapable of being fired,” according to the press release.
A federal judge on Wednesday temporarily blocked New Mexico Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham’s gun ban.
U.S. District Court Judge David Urias, a Biden appointee, issued a temporary restraining order against Grisham’s gun grab until the next hearing in early October.
Judge Urias said Grisham violated the rights of law-abiding citizens to defend themselves.
On Friday, Governor Grisham ‘amended’ her unconstitutional order. She is not complying with the Court’s restraining order.
Blogger's note: She does not care what the law says or the Constitutions, or for that matter what the Courts say. She will protect the citizens from fun violence by banning guns. Does this bitch think that criminals obey unconstitutional dictates? Or is her intent to disarm law abiding citizens for more personal power?
by Jamie White September 12th 2023, 12:08 pm
Image Credit: screenshot/CNN
New Mexico Governor Michelle Lujan Graham (D) doubled down on her decision to impose an executive order suspending the right to carry firearms in Albuquerque and other cities.
Gov. Lujan Grisham appeared on CNN Tuesday to push back against Bernalillo County Sheriff John Allen and DA Sam Bregman who vowed not to enforce her unconstitutional order, claiming they have no authority to decide what’s constitutional or not.
“That’s their opinion. They have no bold actions. They don’t have any plans for reducing gun violence,” Grisham said.
“And frankly, the evidence bears out, over and over again, fewer guns on the streets makes everyone safer. And I’m focused on everyone’s constitutional rights, not just those the NRA says I should be focused on.”your daily routine.
The Democrat governor went on to defend her “swift and bold action” to strip away law-abiding citizens’ Second Amendment rights in the name of preventing “gun violence.”
“It’s not for the police to tell me what’s constitutional or not. They haven’t supported one, not one, gun violence effort in the State of New Mexico…It’s not a ban, it’s a temporary pause to make our communities safer,” Lujan Grisham said.
But even CNN’s Poppy Harlow was skeptical about Lujan Grisham’s rationale, asking, “Do you think you’re on solid constitutional ground here?”
“I wouldn’t do it if I didn’t think I had the right. I have the right,” Lujan Grisham insisted.
“But where is the right? Where is the right?” Harlow asked.
Lujan Grisham said her order was just “a suspension” and “not a ban” and complained that the Supreme Court has restricted abortion but has “broadened” the Second Amendment.
“It’s not a ban. And we’ll see what all of these court actions do. And I did say publicly, Poppy, look, I got a Supreme Court that says my personal bodily autonomy can be restricted. And yet, NRA and other issues on the Second Amendment keeps getting broadened,” Grisham said.
Harlow pointed to the state’s constitution: “The New Mexico constitution, I looked last night, Article 2, Section 6, says this, ‘No law shall abridge the right of citizens to keep and bear arms for security and defense. No municipality or county shall regulate in any way any incident the right to keep and bear arms.’ Are you not in violation of both the U.S. Constitution and your state’s constitution?”
“I don’t believe that we are,” Grisham replied. “And if that narrow reading of the Constitution, which has been tested in the state, we wouldn’t have universal background checks, we wouldn’t have a waiting period, we wouldn’t have a red flag law, we wouldn’t have prohibitions for straw purchases. None of those would have been deemed constitutional. And today all of them are.”
In other words, Lujan Grisham says the creeping erosion of the Second Amendment justifies suspending it altogether.
Harlow then indulged in Grisham’s phony logic, posing a false equivalence between abortion – which is not a constitutional right – and the Second Amendment, asking Grisham how she would react if a Republican governor unilaterally outlawed abortion.
“What if a Republican governor of a state declares a health emergency and unilaterally outlaws abortion in that state, where the legislature has not done so by statute, following your logic, would that also be sound?” she asked.
Lujan Grisham responded: “In this situation, honestly, I don’t think so. But that is what’s happening in this country, is that we’ve got extremists on this question and on reproductive rights.”
In addition to top law enforcement officials pledging not to follow her unconstitutional order, Grisham is now facing impeachment calls by New Mexico lawmakers and lawsuits from gun rights groups.
Grisham’s comments to CNN leave no doubt that she’s an authoritarian ideologue who has no understanding of the Constitution.
Blogger's note: This globalist bitch does not care what the Constitution says. She does not understand the words in the second amendment "shall not be infringed". No exceptions for a power hungry asshole. Banning the legal carry of defensive weapons aids and abets the criminals who DO NOT follow the law. They will still carry and use their weapons.
Source: https://www.infowars.com/posts/new-mexico-dem-governor-doubles-down-on-gun-ban-its-not-for-police-to-tell-me-whats-constitutional-or-not/
No Search Results Found
Terms of Service
DMCA
Advertise with us
Affiliates
Media Inquiries
About
New Mexico Governor Michelle Lujan Graham (D) doubled down on her decision to impose an executive order suspending the right to carry firearms in Albuquerque and other cities.
Gov. Lujan Grisham appeared on CNN Tuesday to push back against Bernalillo County Sheriff John Allen and DA Sam Bregman who vowed not to enforce her unconstitutional order, claiming they have no authority to decide what’s constitutional or not.
“That’s their opinion. They have no bold actions. They don’t have any plans for reducing gun violence,” Grisham said.
“And frankly, the evidence bears out, over and over again, fewer guns on the streets makes everyone safer. And I’m focused on everyone’s constitutional rights, not just those the NRA says I should be focused on.”
The Democrat governor went on to defend her “swift and bold action” to strip away law-abiding citizens’ Second Amendment rights in the name of preventing “gun violence.”
“It’s not for the police to tell me what’s constitutional or not. They haven’t supported one, not one, gun violence effort in the State of New Mexico…It’s not a ban, it’s a temporary pause to make our communities safer,” Lujan Grisham said.
But even CNN’s Poppy Harlow was skeptical about Lujan Grisham’s rationale, asking, “Do you think you’re on solid constitutional ground here?”
“I wouldn’t do it if I didn’t think I had the right. I have the right,” Lujan Grisham insisted.
“But where is the right? Where is the right?” Harlow asked.
Lujan Grisham said her order was just “a suspension” and “not a ban” and complained that the Supreme Court has restricted abortion but has “broadened” the Second Amendment.
“It’s not a ban. And we’ll see what all of these court actions do. And I did say publicly, Poppy, look, I got a Supreme Court that says my personal bodily autonomy can be restricted. And yet, NRA and other issues on the Second Amendment keeps getting broadened,” Grisham said.
Harlow pointed to the state’s constitution: “The New Mexico constitution, I looked last night, Article 2, Section 6, says this, ‘No law shall abridge the right of citizens to keep and bear arms for security and defense. No municipality or county shall regulate in any way any incident the right to keep and bear arms.’ Are you not in violation of both the U.S. Constitution and your state’s constitution?”
“I don’t believe that we are,” Grisham replied. “And if that narrow reading of the Constitution, which has been tested in the state, we wouldn’t have universal background checks, we wouldn’t have a waiting period, we wouldn’t have a red flag law, we wouldn’t have prohibitions for straw purchases. None of those would have been deemed constitutional. And today all of them are.”
In other words, Lujan Grisham says the creeping erosion of the Second Amendment justifies suspending it altogether.
Harlow then indulged in Grisham’s phony logic, posing a false equivalence between abortion – which is not a constitutional right – and the Second Amendment, asking Grisham how she would react if a Republican governor unilaterally outlawed abortion.
“What if a Republican governor of a state declares a health emergency and unilaterally outlaws abortion in that state, where the legislature has not done so by statute, following your logic, would that also be sound?” she asked.
Lujan Grisham responded: “In this situation, honestly, I don’t think so. But that is what’s happening in this country, is that we’ve got extremists on this question and on reproductive rights.”
In addition to top law enforcement officials pledging not to follow her unconstitutional order, Grisham is now facing impeachment calls by New Mexico lawmakers and lawsuits from gun rights groups.
Grisham’s comments to CNN leave no doubt that she’s an authoritarian ideologue who has no understanding of the Constitution.