Breakthrough nutritional solutions discovered that may HALT CLOTTING and UNFOLD spike proteins

Jan 18, 2023

By Mike Adams

(Natural News) We have two important findings to share today about potential nutritional solutions against clotting and spike protein particles. First, a study published in 2021 has suddenly gone viral over the last two days as someone realized it showed how the combination of bromelain and acetylcysteine (both commonly known in the supplement industry) may inactivate the spike protein by altering its morphology, rendering it unable to attack cells in the body.

I’m not sure who first started publicizing this study, but I found it widely posted on Brighteon.social.

The study is titled, “The Combination of Bromelain and Acetylcysteine (BromAc) Synergistically Inactivates SARS-CoV-2.”

It was published in the journal Viruses and appears on Researchgate.net as well as other science article indexing hubs. The full text of the article is available to the public for free.

Authored by a group of researchers — with Ahmed Mekkawy the lead researcher — the study looked at how bromelain and acetylcysteine — also known as the supplement form NAC — alters the glycoproteins of the spike protein. The following chart shows changes in the opacity of SARS-CoC-2 cell cultures upon exposure to different concentrations of the BromAc nutrition combination: (note that the micrograms per mL means ppm, so these are fairly low concentrations yet still have a measurable impact):

Figure 2.Cell lysis assays demonstratedin vitroinactivation potential of Acetylcysteine and Brome-lain combined (BromAc) against SARS-CoV-2. Cell viability was measured by cell staining withNeutral Red, where optical density (OD) is directly proportional to viable cells. Low OD wouldsignify important cell lysis due to virus replication.

The conclusion of the study explains how this combination of Bromelain and Acetylcysteine alters the structure of the SARS-CoC-2 glycoproteins, rendering them unable to attack human cells: (emphasis added)

The combination of Bromelain and Acetylcysteine, BromAc, synergistically inhibited the infectivity of two SARS-CoV-2 strains cultured on Vero cells. Protein con?rmation and its molecular properties are dependent on its structural and geometric integrity, which are dependent on both the peptide linkages and disul?de bridges. Acetylcysteine, as a good reducing agent, tends to reduce the disul?de bridges and hence alter the molecular properties of most proteins. This property has been widely exploited in the development of several therapies (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, allergic airways diseases,cystic ?brosis, pseudomyxoma peritonei, etc.) [20,23–27]. More recently, Acetylcysteine has been used in the development of therapies for respiratory infections such as in?uenza and COVID-19 [28–30], where the integrity of the spike protein is vital for infection [12,13]. A hypothesized mechanism of action could be the unfolding of the spike glycoprotein and the reduction of its disul?de bonds.

A direct mechanical action against this spike protein is a different treatment strategy in comparison to most of the existing antiviral drugs, which prevents viral entry in host cells rather than targeting the replication machinery. BromAc acts as a biochemical agent to destroy complex glycoproteins. Bromelain’s multipotent enzymatic competencies, dominated by the ability to disrupt glycosidic link-ages, usefully complement Acetylcysteine’s strong power to reduce disul?de bond.

The potential of BromAc on SARS-CoV-2 spike and envelope proteins stabilized by disul?de bonds was examined and found to induce the unfolding of recombinant spike and envelope proteins by reducing disul?de stabilizer bridges. BromAc also showed an inhibitory effect on wild-type and spike mutant SARS-CoV-2 by inactivation of its replication capacity in vitro. Hence, BromAc may be an effective therapeutic agent for early SARS-CoV-2infection, despite mutations, and even have potential as a prophylactic in people at high risk of infection.

Importantly, it should be noted that these tests were carried out in vitro, and there have not been any human clinical trials on this combination that I’m aware of, since the NIH would never fund anything other than Big Pharma drugs and vaccine research. Consider the information presented here as a theoretical route action that warrants further exploration.

Nevertheless, given that bromelain and acetylcysteine are widely consumed as nutritional supplements right now — and are readily available and affordable — these solutions warrant consideration as low-cost, low-risk interventions that may prove to help save lives.

Dr. Bryan Ardis reveals a potential solution to halt artificially induced fibrinogen clotting

Yesterday I joined Dr. Bryan Ardis on the Ba’al Busters show to talk about solutions. About 30 minutes into the show, Dr. Ardis unveiled a short presentation that shows how glycyrrhizin, an active constituent of licorice root, was found to strongly impede venom peptide-induced fibrinogen clotting (which can happen in blood).

You can watch that full interview at this link on Brighteon.com.

As I pointed out in the interview, glycyrrhizin is also known to protect the liver from Tylenol toxicity (acetaminophen). It is one of the most potent molecules in both western herbal medicine as well as Traditional Chinese Medicine.

I cover all this and much more in today’s Situation Update podcast:

– Dr. Bryan Ardis reveals nutritional solution against fibrinogen clotting
– Published scientific study reveals nutritional combo that UNFOLDS spike proteins
– WSJ admits CBDCs are coming, whether you’re ready or not – suddenly it’s no longer a conspiracy
– mRNA vaccine push into animal herds is another globalist effort to destroy the meat supply
– The truth about “PureBlood” bull semen and sustainability of animal herds
– Whistleblower reveals US government is running attacks on America’s food infrastructure
– Leftists believe COAL mining is bad, but MINERAL mining for “green” energy is good
– The green energy infrastructure needs 15+ minerals mined from all over the world
– New special report released with Steve Quayle and Mike Adams: “GRID DOWN – What Now?”
– College professor claims astrophysics is RACIST
– Scotland pushing globalist concept of “20 minute neighborhoods” where you are a prisoner
– 90% of online content to be generated by AI in just a few years
– Rise of AI systems underscores the importance of being a creative, conscious HUMAN
– Interview with Daisy Luther from The Organic Prepper about FRUGAL LIVING

Brighteon: Brighteon.com/e726275b-0566-4d5f-baf9-a0e5e8ba69b4

Rumble: Rumble.com/v25z5z8-situation-update-11723-breakthrough-nutritional-solutions-to-halt-clotting..html

Bitchute: Bitchute.com/video/uD9bQ1V2R9J3/

Banned.Video: Banned.video/watch?id=63c699689c97e3192587d704

iTunes podcast: Healthrangerreport.com/situation-update-jan-17-2023-breakthrough-nutritional-solutions-to-halt-clotting-and-unfold-spike-proteins

 

Learn more about herbal solutions and remedies at Herbs.news

Discover more interviews and podcasts each day at:

https://www.brighteon.com/channels/HRreport

Follow me on:

Brighteon.social: Brighteon.social/@HealthRanger (my breaking news gets posted here first)

Telegram: t.me/RealHealthRanger

Substack: HealthRanger.substack.com

Banned.video: Banned.video/channel/mike-adams

Truth Social: https://truthsocial.com/@healthranger

Twitter: @MikeAdamsHR

Gettr: GETTR.com/user/healthranger

Parler: Parler.com/user/HealthRanger

Rumble: Rumble.com/c/HealthRangerReport

BitChute: Bitchute.com/channel/9EB8glubb0Ns/

Clouthub: app.clouthub.com/#/users/u/naturalnews/posts

Join the free NaturalNews.com email newsletter to stay alerted about breaking news each day.

Download my current audio books — including Ghost World, Survival Nutrition, The Global Reset Survival Guide and The Contagious Mind — at:

https://Audiobooks.NaturalNews.com/

Download my new audio book, “Resilient Prepping” at ResilientPrepping.com – it teaches you how to survive the total collapse of civilization and the loss of both the power grid and combustion engines.

Posted by yourNEWS

 

The Reality Of It:

“Immigration Can NEVER Be An Effective Way To Deal With The Suffering People Of The World” (Video Presentation)

Mac Slavo February 5th, 2017 SHTFplan.com       The most oft cited reason by opponents of President Trump’s immigration policies for why America should open its borders to the millions of impoverished and persecuted individuals around the world often center around humanitarian reasons. As a rich country with plenty of land mass, we should be able to take in anyone and everyone who may be in need, right? While that notion, like Marx-Engels’ ideas for taking from those who have the ability and giving to those who need, may seem great on paper, successfully implementing such policies in the real world is starkly different. According to Census Bureau statistics, some 1.3 million foreign-born individuals legally immigrated to the United States in 2014. That figure doesn’t include the nearly one million immigrants that enter the country illegally each year. Those who support open border immigration have said that we need to take in even more people. But according to journalist Roy Beck, taking in one million people per year makes almost no difference in the grand scheme of things because for every million we bring into the United States, another 80 million people yearly are born into countries with extreme levels of poverty, violence or war. According to Beck, even opening our borders to five million more people per year would do nothing to stem the the real problems. In what is one of the most viewed immigration policy videos on the internet from Numbers USA, Beck ingeniously utilizes gumballs to demonstrate why open borders simply will not work. As well, he provides a seemingly novel solution that has for decades fallen on deaf ears: We never get ahead of what’s happening in these countries… Don’t you see? Immigration can never be an effective or significant way to deal with the suffering people of the world… they have to be helped where they live… 99.9% of them will never be able to immigrate to a rich country… there is no hope for that… they have to bloom where they’re planted… the only place that 99.9% of these people can be helped is where they live… let’s help them there. In short: taking in millions of immigrants doesn’t even make a dent. So for those utilizing immigration as justification for violent protests and kinetic civil war, or for those who follow such narratives blindly based strictly on emotions that are devoid of any rational thought, we encourage you to consider the reality of bringing in millions of immigrants from impoverished countries. And don’t just consider the non-effect of such policies as they relate to the global humanitarian situation, but consider the implications this has on America’s resources, as well as our citizens, who will be burdened with heavy taxation to cover the costs. Even if we went by the most radical proposals in Washington, which are to actually double our immigration to two million year… which would totally overwhelm our physical, natural and social infrastructures, we couldn’t even make a visible difference. Click here to subscribe: Join over one million monthly readers and receive breaking news, strategies, ideas and commentary. Please Spread The Word And Share This Post  Author: Mac Slavo Views: Read by 4,014 people Date: February 5th, 2017 Website: www.SHTFplan.com Copyright Information: Copyright SHTFplan and Mac Slavo. This content may be freely reproduced in full or in part in digital form with full attribution to the author and a link to www.shtfplan.com. Please contact us for permission to reproduce this content in other media formats

Why Solving Climate Change Will Be Like Mobilizing For War

Written By: Venkatesh Rao January 15, 2016

TN Note: The author states: “In the war against climate change, powerful technocrats will be far more consequential than energy-sector technologists… What Gates and others are advocating for is not so much a technological revolution as a technocratic one.”

As the 19th century entered its final decade, the War of Currents was nearing its peak. On one side of this war was Thomas Edison, who had invested heavily in direct-current (DC) technology. Tesla and Westinghouse backed alternating-current (AC), which they believed (correctly) to be more efficient.

In the spring of 1891, a seemingly small event in Telluride, Colorado, decisively turned the tide in favor of AC. The Ames hydroelectric-power plant, financed by mining entrepreneur L. L. Nunn, and built around equipment supplied by Westinghouse, began transmitting AC power to Nunn’s gold-mining operations 2.6 miles away.

It was the first successful demonstration of AC’s efficiency advantages over long distances, and it led to the unveiling of AC at the 1893 Chicago World Fair, followed by Westinghouse winning the contract to build an AC-based power plant at Niagara falls. The rest is history. Edison lost the plot, and AC came to dominate the story of electricity.

The victory of AC over DC, in the midst of a noisy debate fueled as much by misinformation and propaganda as by science, is the sort of outcome under uncertainty that markets excel at delivering.

In 2015, the climate-change debate is where the War of Currents was in 1893. The December climate convention in Paris, COP 21, is shaping up to be the most significant since Kyoto in 1997. It might well do for clean-energy technologies what the Chicago World Fair did for electricity. It might be an inflection point.

Except this time around, the drama centers on government and UN technocrats rather than technologists and private investors. Rather than trusting market serendipity, climate experts are hoping that strong regulatory forcing combined with aggressive government investment in energy R&D will do the trick. In the November issue of The Atlantic, Bill Gates makes a persuasive case for just this approach.

Is Gates right that this dual-pronged attack is necessary? Probably. Can it work? There’s a slim chance.

t’s clear that the market is unlikely to solve the problem of climate change on its own. If scientists are right, and there is no reason to think they aren’t, averting climate change will require such large-scale, rapid action, that no single energy technology, new or emerging, could be the solution. Neither could any single non-energy technology, such as video-conferencing as a substitute for travel, solve the problem on its own.

There is always a possibility that a single cheap and effective solution will emerge, rendering expensive interventions moot, but few climate experts are willing to trust the future to that unlikely prospect.

The challenge therefore, is one of rapid, concerted deployment of a portfolio of emerging and mature energy and non-energy technologies. This means accepting a certain level of attendant risks. The Volkwagen emissions scandal illustrates these risks well: Aggressive forcing, through EU policy instruments, of the adoption of diesel engines (which are better suited to reducing emissions) created incentives that led to sophisticated gaming.

 

Note source:  Technocracy.news

Read the full story here…