The Clinton Scandal just got $6 BILLION Bombshell, Guccifer Leaks Show ENTIRE “Shipment,” Clinton Muslim Network EXPOSED
Hillary Clinton (and Bill Clinton for that matter) is the worst kind of person imaginable. She lies, she cheats, she murders, and, of course, she steals.
She lies, she cheats, she murders, and, of course, she steals.
However, never has she been caught in as big of a financial scandal as what just came out today.
During Clinton’s short time as Secretary of State, and incredible $6 BILLION went missing!
Hmmmmm…..Now who could have done that?
Well, let’s take a look at the facts.
On Friday the Cause of Action Institute (CoA), a non-profit government watchdog group, filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request for a “management alert” issued in March of 2014 by the Department’s Inspector General.
“The total value of the contracts the [IG] reviewed exceeded $6 billion,” the CoA’s FOIA request said. “Many of these cases arose during the tenure of Secretary Hillary Clinton.”
So what happened to the $6 billion in missing taxpayer money?
The Department’s Office of Inspector General (“OIG”) issued a management alert in March 2014 highlighting “significant vulnerabilities in the management of contract file documentation that could expose the Department to substantial financial losses.”
2
Specifically, the management alert noted instances where the Department of State lost contract files, maintained incomplete contract files, and allowed an unauthorized payment to a contractor.
3
Many of these cases arose during the tenure of Secretary Hillary Clinton. The total value of the contracts the OIG reviewed exceeded $6 billion.
4
Bombshell: Clinton Foundation Witnesses Coming Forward In Pay-For-Play Investigation
Today, New York Times Bestselling author Ed Klein has revealed on The Sean Hannity Show that sources have confirmed to him that not only is The Clinton Foundation under federal investigation, but also at least one Clinton Foundation insider is prepared to testify in a court of law against Hillary.
Reports of legal troubles for the foundation began last week when The Daily Caller reported that a joint FBI-US Attorney probe of The Clinton Foundation is currently underway. The charge is supported by a number of emails recently released by Judicial Watch, which suggest The Clinton Foundation engaged in pay-for-play while Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State.
“We are a long way from Hillary Clinton sliding into The White House without having some real serious legal problems before this election,” Klein told Hannity.
During his interview, Klein, author of the forthcoming book Guilty As Sin, dropped a number of bombshells:
– Klein confirmed that the ongoing investigation is being led by Preet Bharara, U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York. Although he was appointed by Barack Obama, Bharara is known as a hard-nosed attorney–and has the track record to prove it. Bharara has successfully prosecuted dozens of Wall Street Executives and powerful politicians, including former New York’s Democratic Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver, who was sent to prison for 12 years on federal corruption charges.
Bharara is reportedly working with the Federal Bureau of Investigation and two other District Attorneys, one in Little Rock, Arkansas, and another in Washington D.C.
“This investigation, I would say, is hotter than ever,” Klein told Sean. Klein added that FBI Director James Comey may be seeking to “redeem himself” with a public corruption charge against Hillary after he failed to recommend indictment for her mishandling of classified information.
– According to Klein, Comey and Bharara have been in contact for months on the subject of Hillary Clinton’s public corruption with the Clinton Foundation while she was Secretary of State.
Sen. Grassley letter to Loretta Lynch 8/15/16
“At this point, the American people and Congress are owed answers.”
In a single sentence, that is the message Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley had for Attorney General Loretta Lynch in a letter he sent Monday afternoon. And, by his estimation, there are a lot of questions left unanswered at this point.
“I am writing in regard to the recent news reports that indicate the Federal Bureau of Investigation asked the Department of Justice to open an inquiry into the Clinton Foundation on public corruption grounds, and the Public Integrity Unit declined to do so. Reporting also indicates that three ‘field offices’ agreed that the DOJ should pursue an inquiry into the Clinton Foundation. Other reports claim that one year prior to the FBI’s request, the DOJ had already refused a previous attempt to open a case with respect to the Clinton Foundation.
“Indeed, in January 2016, reports indicated that the FBI investigation in Secretary Clinton’s use of a non-government server and personal email for official business had expanded to Clinton Foundation donations and their impact on State Department business. Despite that report, Director Comey refused to answer Chairman Chaffetz of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee as to whether the FBI’s recent criminal investigation into Secretary Clinton’s email use also extended to the Clinton Foundation.”
Grassley points out in his letter that in May, he raised “several questions” of his own about the Clinton Foundation, and those questions have also gone unanswered. He then offered a bundle of examples of potential Clinton Foundation corruption that have yet to be investigated by the Justice Department.
These include:
- Long-time aide Huma Abedin’s connections to the State Department, Clinton Foundation and Teneo Holdings;
- A group of Swedish companies that received a reprieve from Iran sanctions after donating millions to the Clinton Foundation;
- The Clinton Foundation’s ties to a number of people involved in the Russian acquisition of Uranium One;
- Numerous businesses that donated to the Clinton Foundation while lobbying the State Department;
- Nearly every country that has donated to the Clinton Foundation saw increases in the number of weapons deals approved by the State Department; and
- A number of foreign donations to the Clinton Foundation were not reported and/or reviewed by the State Department.
“While all of these circumstances are not proof of wrongdoing, they do raise reasonable suspicions and undermine the public’s confidence in the integrity of the State Department’s operations during Secretary Clinton’s tenure,” Grassley wrote. “The American people are entitled to reassurance that these matters have received thorough and objective investigation. Yet, it appears that the DOJ has turned a blind eye and refused to investigate.
“According to reports, tens of millions of dollars flowed from parties with business with the federal government to the Clinton Foundation and the Clintons themselves. All of these donations should have been disclosed in full, but those reviewing the disclosures had no chance to ensure total compliance with the memorandum of understanding process because the Clinton Foundation failed to disclose all donations.
Guccifer Leaks Show ENTIRE “Shipment,” Clinton Muslim Network EXPOSED
The media and the government have protected Crooked Hillary for decades, but thanks to patriots like Julian Assange and Judicial Watch, the people are finally seeing the evidence to support our claims that she is a corrupt liar.
Guccifer 1.0 is the original hacker from Russia that started this trend in 2011. After he was caught and arrested for hacking Clinton’s server, he allegedly gave the information to the authorities, but he also gave it to several others hackers, even Julian Assange.
What we uncovered was that the State Department, headed by Hillary Clinton, approved a massive weapons shipment from a California company to Libyans seeking to oust Moammar Qaddafi in 2011 even though a United Nations arms ban was in place.
These documents were only recovered because they were retrieved from the burned-out compound in Benghazi after Hillary finally sent it reinforcements to help.
The documents indicate that US diplomats in Benghazi were closely monitoring several US-sanctioned shipments to allies, and a plethora of them were headed to the Transitional National Council, the Libyan movement that was seeking to overthrow Qaddafi.
So, we can see a pattern. Hillary approved weapons sales to Libyan Islamic radicals to supply them for their mission to oust Qaddafi, but it backfired as they later attacked our Benghazi compound and killed four Americans with the weapons Hillary supplied them!
We don’t have the full inventory list, but several State Department officials have indicated that the shipment included hundreds of rocket and grenade launchers, 7,000 machine guns, and 8 million rounds of ammunition.
Dolarian Capital, a member working with U.S. intelligence, confirmed one of its licensing requests to ship weapons via Kuwait to Libya was approved by the State Department in spring 2011 and then randomly denied before they could carry out the transaction.
Thanks to a leaked document from a burn-bag, we can confirm that Hillary Rodham Clinton’s State Department directly approved a weapon sale to place weapons into the hands of Islamic terrorists seeking to oust Gadhafi.
Multiple former CIA officials have stated publicly that Hillary and Obama are lying about supplying terrorists with weapons, and that this was a a covert program that Hillary orchestrated and wants to bury it now. The issue remains highly sensitive because there was a United Nations ban on weapons shipments to Libya at the time.
It was heavily reported in 2011 by Reuters and The New York Times that Obama authorized this covert transaction, but now he has stepped away from it because it has been linked to Benghazi. Obama and Hillary never thought this information would leak back after the terrorist overthrew Qaddafi, but when they used in on the Benghazi attacks, their entire master plan backfired.
On March 17, 2011, the U.N. passed Resolution 1973, which imposed a no-fly zone over Libya and also established a panel of experts to monitor the arms embargo approved by the US. However, on March 27, 2011, Clinton argued that the arms embargo could be disregarded if shipping weapons to rebels would help protect civilians.
The weapons list revealed where and when arms were brought to both terror and jihadi groups in Libyan cities including the rebel fortress of Benghazi by the country of Qatar. It did not detail the weapons’ point of origin, but in February 2012 Qatari officials sent a letter to the U.N. “categorically” denying they had “supplied the revolutionaries with arms and ammunition’s.”
Tape recordings obtained and released by The Times earlier this year depicting secret calls between a U.S. intelligence asset and members of the Qaddafi family revealed the then Libyan regime believed NATO was helping Qatar and other countries illegally smuggle arms across their country’s borders to aide rebel forces in an attempt to destabilize Libya.
Hillary Clinton endorsed the idea of using arms merchants to help the Libyans one month before they supplied them the arms deal. The State Department used Dolarian Capital because they have worked with U.S. intelligence over the years to move covert shipments into hot spots around the globe such as Iraq, Afghanistan and Nigeria.
0 comments:
Post a Comment