The polio vaccine did not save 20 million children from paralysis

 FACT CHECK: The polio vaccine did not save 20 million children from paralysis over the past 36 years

12/30/2024 // Lance D Johnson

In a desperate attempt to stop Robert F. Kennedy Jr. from being nominated to lead the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), corporate media outlets were commissioned to publish hit pieces on Kennedy for allegedly not supporting the polio vaccine and putting millions of children at risk. On December 13, Fortune published an article claiming that the polio vaccine is “safe and effective” and thanks to this vaccine, “20 million people who would’ve otherwise been paralyzed by polio are walking today.”

This statement is a gross misunderstanding of the scientific literature, and is a laughable assertion that defies simple mathematics.

Did the polio vaccine save 20 million children from paralysis?

While polio can become a serious disease, especially in the case of immunocompromised children, the risk of paralysis is relatively low. According to the FDA, only about 0.001% of poliovirus infections lead to paralysis. The last wild poliovirus case reported in the U.S. was in 1979, according to the CDC. Most infections are asymptomatic, and only a small percentage result in severe illness. This raises questions about the balance between vaccine benefits and risks, particularly in regions where wild poliovirus has been eradicated.

According to the World Health Organization (WHO), there were 350,000 reported polio cases globally in 1988, with one in 200 infections leading to irreversible paralysis. This translates to approximately 1,750 paralysis cases that year. Factoring in a 1.2% annual population growth rate, the estimated number of paralysis cases between 1988 and 2024 would be around 80,910—far lower than the 20 million figure cited by Fortune.

The U.S., despite not seeing a wild poliovirus case since 1979, exclusively uses the inactivated polio vaccine (IPV), which is injected and contains a dead poliovirus. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), IPV is safe and effective at preventing severe disease but does not stop transmission or infection. This means vaccinated individuals can still carry and spread the virus, even if they don’t fall ill. This means that recently vaccinated individuals are the ones who pose risks to immunocompromised individuals.

Currently, only one stand-alone IPV product, IPOL, is licensed in the U.S., manufactured by Sanofi. However, concerns have been raised about its safety. A 2022 petition to the FDA highlighted that IPOL is produced using genetically modified monkey kidney cells, which could carry viral contaminants. The petition also criticized the lack of long-term safety studies, as clinical trials monitored participants for only three days post-vaccination. Despite these concerns, the FDA has not withdrawn its approval.

The global perspective: OPV and vaccine-derived polio

Outside the U.S., the oral polio vaccine (OPV) is used in mass vaccination campaigns. Unlike IPV, OPV prevents transmission but carries a unique risk: the weakened vaccine-virus can mutate and cause outbreaks of vaccine-derived polio. This has led to cases in Gaza, New York, and the Democratic Republic of the Congo, where seven children were paralyzed in 2023 after exposure to a vaccine-derived strain.

The WHO acknowledges this risk but continues to use OPV in global eradication efforts. A new genetically modified OPV, nOPV2, was developed to reduce this risk, but its deployment has not eliminated the problem entirely.

All polio vaccines used today are genetically modified, a departure from the original vaccines developed by Dr. Jonas Salk and Dr. Albert Sabin. IPOL, for instance, is produced using immortalized monkey kidney cells, a process that has sparked ethical and safety debates. Critics argue that the long-term effects of these modifications have not been adequately studied.

The question now lies with parents: is the polio vaccine that’s licensed in the US even necessary to protect their child? Why are polio vaccine campaigns used overseas if they use different vaccine technology and lead to vaccine-derived polio outbreaks?

Sources include:

ChildrensHealthDefense.org

Fortune.com

Vaccines.news

Source

The polio vaccine did not save 20 million children from paralysis over the past 36 years

 FACT CHECK: The polio vaccine did not save 20 million children from paralysis over the past 36 years

12/30/2024 // Lance D Johnson 

In a desperate attempt to stop Robert F. Kennedy Jr. from being nominated to lead the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), corporate media outlets were commissioned to publish hit pieces on Kennedy for allegedly not supporting the polio vaccine and putting millions of children at risk. On December 13, Fortune published an article claiming that the polio vaccine is “safe and effective” and thanks to this vaccine, “20 million people who would’ve otherwise been paralyzed by polio are walking today.”

This statement is a gross misunderstanding of the scientific literature, and is a laughable assertion that defies simple mathematics.

Did the polio vaccine save 20 million children from paralysis?

While polio can become a serious disease, especially in the case of immunocompromised children, the risk of paralysis is relatively low. According to the FDA, only about 0.001% of poliovirus infections lead to paralysis. The last wild poliovirus case reported in the U.S. was in 1979, according to the CDC. Most infections are asymptomatic, and only a small percentage result in severe illness. This raises questions about the balance between vaccine benefits and risks, particularly in regions where wild poliovirus has been eradicated.

According to the World Health Organization (WHO), there were 350,000 reported polio cases globally in 1988, with one in 200 infections leading to irreversible paralysis. This translates to approximately 1,750 paralysis cases that year. Factoring in a 1.2% annual population growth rate, the estimated number of paralysis cases between 1988 and 2024 would be around 80,910—far lower than the 20 million figure cited by Fortune.

The U.S., despite not seeing a wild poliovirus case since 1979, exclusively uses the inactivated polio vaccine (IPV), which is injected and contains a dead poliovirus. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), IPV is safe and effective at preventing severe disease but does not stop transmission or infection. This means vaccinated individuals can still carry and spread the virus, even if they don’t fall ill. This means that recently vaccinated individuals are the ones who pose risks to immunocompromised individuals.

Currently, only one stand-alone IPV product, IPOL, is licensed in the U.S., manufactured by Sanofi. However, concerns have been raised about its safety. A 2022 petition to the FDA highlighted that IPOL is produced using genetically modified monkey kidney cells, which could carry viral contaminants. The petition also criticized the lack of long-term safety studies, as clinical trials monitored participants for only three days post-vaccination. Despite these concerns, the FDA has not withdrawn its approval.

The global perspective: OPV and vaccine-derived polio

Outside the U.S., the oral polio vaccine (OPV) is used in mass vaccination campaigns. Unlike IPV, OPV prevents transmission but carries a unique risk: the weakened vaccine-virus can mutate and cause outbreaks of vaccine-derived polio. This has led to cases in Gaza, New York, and the Democratic Republic of the Congo, where seven children were paralyzed in 2023 after exposure to a vaccine-derived strain.

The WHO acknowledges this risk but continues to use OPV in global eradication efforts. A new genetically modified OPV, nOPV2, was developed to reduce this risk, but its deployment has not eliminated the problem entirely.

All polio vaccines used today are genetically modified, a departure from the original vaccines developed by Dr. Jonas Salk and Dr. Albert Sabin. IPOL, for instance, is produced using immortalized monkey kidney cells, a process that has sparked ethical and safety debates. Critics argue that the long-term effects of these modifications have not been adequately studied.

The question now lies with parents: is the polio vaccine that’s licensed in the US even necessary to protect their child? Why are polio vaccine campaigns used overseas if they use different vaccine technology and lead to vaccine-derived polio outbreaks?

Sources include:

ChildrensHealthDefense.org

Fortune.com

Vaccines.news

Source: FACT CHECK: The polio vaccine did not save 20 million children from paralysis over the past 36 years – NaturalNews.com 

 

Bill Gates-Linked Vaccine Delivered Through Mosquito Bite Carries Bioengineered Malaria-Causing Parasite

by Jamie WhiteDecember 29th, 2024 9:50 AM 

A bizarre experiment funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation developed a new vaccine strategy using mosquito bites as a delivery vector in pursuit of developing a “next generation” malaria vaccine.

The experiment was conducted by researchers at the Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) in Leiden, Netherlands, and published last month in the peer-reviewed New England Journal of Medicine.

Researchers explained how they used the bites of mosquitos to deliver a short-lived malaria vaccine comprised of genetically modified malaria parasites.

“We conducted a double-blind, controlled clinical trial to evaluate the safety, side-effect profile, and efficacy of immunization, by means of mosquito bites, with a second-generation genetically attenuated parasite (GA2) — a mei2 single knockout P. falciparum NF54 parasite (sporozoite form) with extended development into the liver stage,” the researchers stated.

The Plasmodium falciparum (P. falciparum) parasite causes malaria in humans.

The method was meant to boost immunity through bites from mosquitoes carrying a genetically engineered version of the parasite that causes malaria.

First, researchers bioengineered two different types of malaria parasites for the experiment, GA1 and GA2.

GA1 was “designed to stop developing about 24 hours after infection in humans,” but had limited effectiveness, leading to the development of GA2.

GA2 was “designed to stop developing about six days post-infection, during the crucial period where the parasites replicate in human liver cells.”

The experiment was carried out in two stages.

In Stage A, study participants “were exposed to the bites of 15 or 50 infected mosquitoes.”

In Stage B, “healthy adults who had not had malaria were randomly assigned to be exposed to 50 mosquito bites per immunization of GA2, an early-arresting parasite (GA1), or placebo (bites from uninfected mosquitoes).”

Notably, the researchers only tracked infections for 25 days, which means more infections could have occurred after that short tracking period.

And 20% of participants in Stage B showed elevated troponin T levels, a biomarker for heart muscle damage or stress, raising concerns about potential cardiac injury.

However the researchers claimed the elevated T levels were “unrelated to the trial intervention” without elaborating on how they came to that conclusion.

COVID pandemic critic Dr. Richard Bartlett criticized the study’s short observation window, noting that long-term safety data was needed.

“The study raises significant red flags,” Dr. Bartlett said. “Tracking participants for just a few weeks is completely inadequate to assess long-term safety or efficacy. We need at least 6 months to a year to properly monitor for parasite infections and evaluate potential complications. Where is the long-term safety data? Without it, we cannot account for late-onset issues or complications that might arise.”

He also claimed the elevated T levels were “highly concerning.”

“Troponin is a specific marker for heart cell damage, not the liver,” he said. “This points to potential cardiac injury, which was seemingly dismissed without proper investigation. This is a serious safety signal that cannot be ignored.”

Bill Gates’ philanthropic fingerprints are all over this study.

The same month the study was published, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation donated $2,287,871 to LUMC to develop “next generation malaria vaccine candidates,” according to the organization’s website.

During the height of the COVID plandemic, critics of the experimental mRNA injections were censored and vilified for speaking out.

Now it seems that mosquito bites are emerging as the next vaccine delivery vector, possibly to circumvent informed consent in future pandemic operations.

Be sure to visit the Alex Jones Store to help keep us in the fight against the New World Order!

Sourcee & video

Top Scientist Proves Every Major Vaccine Since 1992 Purposely Contains Deadly Cancer Viruses

 

Top Scientist Proves Every Major Vaccine Since 1992 Purposely Contains Deadly Cancer Viruses— Dr. Judy Mikovits Exposes What’s Really Behind The C@#$% Tyranny

Dr. Judy Mikovits joins The Alex Jones Show to uncover alarming details about vaccines, cancer-causing viruses, and their ties to pandemic-era control measures.

Source & videos

Read more & video

Bill Gates and WHO Call For Military To Round Up mRNA Vaccine Refusers During Bird Flu Pandemic

Fact checked by The People's Voice Community

August 1, 2024 Baxter Dmitry

Bill Gates has joined forces with the World Health Organization in calling for vaccine refusers to be rounded up by the military and force-jabbed with mRNA during the next pandemic.

Source, read more & video

 

Save Our Sovereignty

www.SaveOurSoverignty.co.uk

Repeat Influenza Vaccination Linked to Higher Risk of Infection: CDC Preprint

Scientists still have questions about the mechanism involved in the increased infection risk among repeat vaccinees.

By Marina Zhang

12/29/2023

Updated:

12/29/2023

 

A recent preprint co-authored by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) U.S. Flu Vaccine Effectiveness Network Investigators finds that repeat annual influenza vaccines are associated with an increased risk of influenza infection.

The preprint authors initially wondered if vaccination timing and influenza infections in prior seasons may have contributed to repeat vaccinees’ increased risk of infection.

However, they concluded these factors “cannot fully explain the increased infection risk in repeat vaccinees compared with non-repeat vaccinees.”

Repeat Vaccinees More Likely to Contract 1 Type of Flu

The study followed patients who had presented themselves with respiratory diseases at one of the designated clinics between the 2011 and 2019 seasons. Over 55,000 clinical visits were analyzed, and vaccine status was further examined.

Repeat vaccinees, when compared against non-repeat vaccinees, had a 10 percent increased risk of contracting the influenza type A H3N2 virus but not for influenza type B and influenza type A H1N1 variants.

Those who contracted influenza in prior seasons were more protected against infection if the current circulating variant was of the same subtype.

While repeat vaccinees tended to get vaccinated around a week earlier than non-repeat vaccinees, and the unvaccinated who became infected the prior season did tend to get vaccinated the following season, the authors found that neither factor significantly changed the estimates on the effects of repeat vaccination.

An Ongoing Dilemma

Increased risk of influenza infection among the repeat vaccinated is a phenomenon commonly observed for decades.

 

For audio the source is https://www.theepochtimes.com/health/repeat-influenza-vaccination-linked-to-higher-risk-of-infection-cdc-preprint-5555230?src_src=News&src_cmp=breaking-2023-12-30-2&est=aU3FGeHOdoyfbCWyD7JAeH6IGp2rznPm5glDwHWQ9U5%2BxbcXhUaDmPhLGw%3D%3D

 

 

 

In relentless pursuit of endless vaccines: Bill Gates strikes again with new ‘wafer’ vax

Bill Gates is pumping vast sums of cash into a new “needle-free” mRNA vaccine technology in preparation for the next big pandemic.

All you’ll have to do is stick his little “wafer” inside your cheek or under your tongue and you’ll be “protected” from the virus that’s no doubt already ready and waiting to be released from some distant biolab.

The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is teaming up on the project with the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations, or CEPI, reports Slay News.

CEPI was founded with $460 million in seed money from Gates.

In fact, Gates mentioned CEPI in that now-famous interview he did three years ago when he snickered and predicted with ominous confidence that if Covid doesn’t scare you the next pandemic “will get attention next time.” 

The Covid pandemic had barely started, you see, and Gates was already planning to make money on the next pandemic.

Gates and the CEPI are investing $1.2 million in a startup to create wafers laced with mRNA that go under the tongue to dispense his new vaccine.

The wafer can be stored at any temperature and can be administered without the use of needles.

Critics question the reliability of the technology and the safety of the mRNA platform.

With funding from Gates’ organization, CEPI is partnering with Jurata Thin Film Inc. to develop a wafer-like mRNA film.

The huge cash injections from Gates will give a massive boost to help Jurata develop its proprietary vaccine platform.

According to the announcement, the $1.2 million grant from Gates is just to get the project off the ground with more funding coming at later stages.

The company says its new platform stabilizes mRNA-containing lipid nanoparticle vaccine technologies in a thin film.

Check out the new book: Gates of Hell: Why Bill Gates Is the Most Dangerous Man in the World

The new wafer vax can also remain stable for three years, eliminating the need for energy-intensive cold storage required by current mRNA vaccines.

Jurata and CEPI believe the technology is key to getting more vaccines into the bodies of poor people worldwide.

Leave it to Bill Gates, ever the technocrat, to think of a better, more profitable and efficient way to deliver life-ending toxic vaccines.

Some Christian denominations receive a “wafer” on the tongue for Holy Communion. Is this an attempt by Satan to mock that solemn Christian expression of God’s love and presence among us? Here we have a satanic wafer offered by the secular humanists and technocratic tyrants trying to beat us into submission to their false ideologies while enticing us with a false global religion. God is the lover of souls. Lucifer is the god of this world who hates humanity and wants to destroy it.

Just as many Western nations are being destroyed from within in the name of “democracy,” so many human bodies are being destroyed internally through Gates’s toxic death potions disguised as “life-saving vaccines.”

The “Gates of Hell” appear to be opening in the earth today.

LeoHohmann.com is a fully independent news reporting and analyzing site that operates solely on the support of its readers, no ads or grants from any corporate or government entity. If you appreciate my work and would like to support it, you may send a donation c/o Leo Hohmann, P.O. Box 291, Newnan, GA 30264, or via credit card below.

Source:  https://leohohmann.com/2023/12/20/in-relentless-pursuit-of-endless-vaccines-bill-gates-strikes-again-with-new-wafer-vax/#more-16969

 

How Pfizer Hid Nearly 80% of COVID Vaccine Trial Deaths From Regulators

Written by: Tim Brown

Published on: October 30, 2023 

Despite what Big Pharma, The Mockingbird media, Big Government and bought-and-paid-for, self-appointed “fact checkers” tell you, Big Pharma was hiding a dangerously dirty, little secret from the public.  Yes, they tried to hide nearly 80% of the deaths from the COVID shot during their clinical trials.

Children’s Health Defense’s Dr. Angelo DePalma wrote, “According to an analysis, published this month in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research, of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine clinical trial data, the vaccine makers hid fatality data from regulators in order to qualify for Emergency Use Authorization.”

Pfizer-BioNTech delayed reporting vaccine-associated deaths among BNT162b2 clinical trial participants until after the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for the product.

The vaccine makers also failed to account for a large number of subjects who dropped out of the trial.

Together, these strategies kept regulators and the public ignorant of a 3.7-fold increase in cardiac deaths among subjects who received the vaccine, according to analysis in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research.

The authors of the paper described it as a “forensic analysis,” defined by the U.S. National Institute for Standards and Technology as “the use of scientific methods or expertise to investigate crimes or examine evidence that might be presented in a court of law.”

What the analysis shows

Read more 

Source:  https://sonsoflibertymedia.com/how-pfizer-hid-nearly-80-of-covid-vaccine-trial-deaths-from-regulators/

 

 

 

“We’re in 1984/Orwell Territory”: Author Raises Alarm on Government Censorship of Vaccine Side Effects

Infowars.com

August 24th 2023, 10:04 am

Bestselling author Michael Shellenberger warned that humanity has entered an age of tyranny seen in George Orwell’s seminal cautionary tale 1984 now that it’s known the government censored true vaccine side effect stories.

Shellenberger stressed the government can now “justify the censorship of anything” after being caught shutting down lifesaving facts about vaccines:

… The most egregious [government censorship] is when White House officials demanded that Facebook censor people for sharing true stories about vaccine side effects. The demand was made that it be censored not because it was “misinformation”, not because it was “disinformation”, but because it was true information that might lead to vaccine hesitancy, to a reluctance on the part of people to get vaccines. 

So we’re in 1984/Orwell territory…

[The government now censors true information] that may result in behaviors that [it doesn’t] like. At that point, you can justify censorship of anything.

Video