CLICK HERE FOR THOUSANDS OF FREE BLOGGER TEMPLATES »
Showing posts with label Native Americans. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Native Americans. Show all posts

Monday, February 19, 2024

Death Squads And The Price Of Justice In America

Death Squads And The Price Of Justice In America  


By Mark Adams

Leonard Peltier is the crown jewel of American injustice. He is 79 years old and has been locked in prison for almost 50 years for crimes which the government admits it cannot prove he committed. Today he is afflicted with diabetes and a worrisome aortic aneurysm. As an advocate for the American Indian Movement (AIM) Peltier was well known to the FBI in the early 1970s.

Following a controversial trial Peltier was convicted of two counts of first-degree murder in the deaths of two FBI agents (Ron Williams and Jack Coler) in a June 26, 1975 shootout on the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation in South Dakota.

AIM was founded in Minneapolis in 1968, its activism reached an apex on February 27, 1973 when approximately 200 AIM followers seized and took control of the town Wounded Knee, S.D. From the onset the FBI, vehemently opposed to the AIM, chose to use a paramilitary group of vigilantes known as the GOON squad as a proxy to wage internecine warfare on the AIM members, their supporters, and relatives. It turns out that the vigilante right-wing paramilitary GOON squad was in fact funded by the U.S. government.

http://www.whoisleonardpeltier.info/LEGAL/uploads/2016clemencyapp.pdf – Page 16

In the wake of Wounded Knee the GOON squad did its grisly work with total impunity including ambush murders, fire bombings and extremely violent physical assaults using baseball bats and tire irons. “More than 50 AIM members and allies died through violence – bodies were found along roadsides or deposited in areas immediately adjacent to the Reservation.”

http://www.whoisleonardpeltier.info/LEGAL/uploads/2016clemencyapp.pdf Pages 18-19

FBI agents had supplied GOONs with armor-piercing bullets, grenades, and even plastic explosives to use against the AIM members.

https://openyls.law.yale.edu/bitstream/handle/20.500.13051/7738/10_3YaleJL_Lib83_1992_.pdf Page 91

Between March 1, 1973 and March 1, 1976, the per capita murder rate on Pine Ridge was 170 per 100,000. By comparison, Detroit, Michigan (at the time, considered the murder capital of the United States) had a rate of 20.2 per 100,000. For that period of time Pine Ridge most likely was the murder capital of the entire world.

http://www.whoisleonardpeltier.info/LEGAL/uploads/2016clemencyapp.pdf Page 18

Against this background of inflamed violence the FBI was increasing manpower in the region not to help or protect the AIM members but to be prepared to engage in an all out paramilitary assault against them. Among the outrageous lies publicized by the FBI was that various AIM centers were fortified with hardened bunkers.

On June 5, 1975, three weeks before the firefight, an FBI Document titled “Law Enforcement on Pine Ridge Indian Reservation” described “[P]ockets of Indian population which consist almost exclusively of AIM members … It is significant that in some of these AIM centers the residents have built bunkers which would literally require military assault forces if it were necessary to overcome resistance emanating from the bunkers.”

http://www.whoisleonardpeltier.info/LEGAL/uploads/2016clemencyapp.pdf Page 19 (Emphasis added.)

On July 9,1975 William Muldrow of the United States Commission on Civil Rights issued a memorandum declaring that the “bunkers” were nothing more than aged root cellars and that the “trench fortifications described by the FBI to the press did not exist.”

http://www.whoisleonardpeltier.info/LEGAL/uploads/2016clemencyapp.pdf Page 20 (Emphasis added.)

Ten days before the firefight erupted the FBI was vastly increasing personnel in the region. “On June 16, 1975, the FBI increased its manpower by ordering additional Special Agents into South Dakota for a temporary 60-day period. This build up and the presence of SWAT units that appeared to be collaborating with Wilson’s GOON Squad added to an already very tense situation. In this hostile environment, violent assaults, murders and drive-by shootings were common.”

http://www.whoisleonardpeltier.info/LEGAL/uploads/2016clemencyapp.pdf Page 20 (Emphasis added.)

As described by William Muldrow of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights the entire reservation, roughly the size of Connecticut – was a tinderbox about to explode. “It was in this climate of fear and tension in 1975 that the two FBI agents, in unmarked cars and clad in civilian clothes, we’re shot in a firefight.”

William Muldrow Director (Retired) Rocky Mountain Regional Office U.S. Commission on Civil Rights 11/1/1999

http://web.archive.org/web/20021113132433/www.freepeltier.org/peltier11.htm#top

To this day it is still disputed how the shooting started and who shot first. FBI media liaison Tom Coll wasted no time claiming that the agents were “lured” into a “‘carefully prepared ambush’ where they were ‘fired upon with automatic weapons’ from a ‘sophisticated bunker complex’, ‘riddled with fifteen to twenty bullets apiece’; ‘dragged from their cars’; and ‘stripped’; and – in one version – ‘scalped’.”

https://openyls.law.yale.edu/bitstream/handle/20.500.13051/7738/10_3YaleJL_Lib83_1992_.pdf Page 94

By the government’s own estimates there were over 40 Native Americans present at Pine Ridge during the firefight and many were shooting.

http://www.whoisleonardpeltier.info/LEGAL/uploads/2016clemencyapp.pdf Page 21

Four men — Leonard Peltier, James Eagle, Robert Robideau and Darelle Butler — were charged with killing the agents. In the summer of 1976, with Peltier seeking political asylum and fighting extradition from Canada, the government tried Butler and Robideau. If Peltier had not escaped to Canada but was tried together with Butler and Robideau he too would have been found not guilty.

“The jury agreed with the defense contention that an atmosphere of fear and violence exists on the reservation,” the jury foreman said, “and that the defendants arguably could have been shooting in self-defense.” https://famous-trials.com/leonardpeltier/748-home

Richard W. Held was Special Agent-in-Charge of the San Francisco FBI Office 1985-1993. Held’s work contributed to the framing of Leonard Peltier, and to covering up the truth about the agents’ deaths and the still unsolved killings of 70 AIM supporters on the Pine Ridge Reservation. Credit

Peltier who fled for Canada was captured and subsequently extradited to the United States, albeit illegally.

“Mr. Peltier’s extradition to the U.S. was achieved based on false affidavits—obtained by the government through coercion and deceit, and known by the government to be false. The false affidavits had been signed by Myrtle Poor Bear, a Native American woman known to have serious mental health problems.”

https://www.whoisleonardpeltier.info/to-the-washington-times-et-al-leonard-peltier-was-wrongfully-convicted/

As later explained in a legal filing on behalf of Peltier, using the false testimony of Myrtle Poor Bear by the FBI was abusive:

“The use of the affidavits of Myrtle Poor Bear in the extradition proceedings was, to say the least, a clear abuse of the investigative process by the F.B.I.” — Hon. Donald Ross, in conjunction with United States v. Peltier, 585 F.2d 314, 335 n.18 (8th Cir. 1978).

http://www.whoisleonardpeltier.info/LEGAL/uploads/2016clemencyapp.pdf Page 1

Peltier’s murder trial was typical of the Stalin show trials of the 1930s. For instance, a damaged AR-15 (allegedly Peltier’s) was “matched” to a bullet casing supposedly found in the trunk of Coler’s car. Four years later, the FBI released a cache of documents including a teletype describing a more conclusive ballistics test that determined Peltier’s AR-15 could not have fired the fatal shots. Prosecutors called the .223 shell casing the “most critical” piece of evidence against Peltier and urged the jury to conclude that the matching shell casing proved that Peltier fired the fatal shots into the heads of the two federal agents – in “cold blood”

http://www.whoisleonardpeltier.info/LEGAL/uploads/2016clemencyapp.pdf Page 31

So there you have it, the government’s “most critical” evidence was a total fabrication and without it its impossible to prove who killed FBI agents Coler and Williams.

“Judge Gerald Heaney reminded [Assistant U.S. Attorney Lynn] Crooks that in his summation at the Fargo trial he had pointed at Peltier as ‘the man who came down and killed those agents in cold blood.’ Pressed on this point by Judge Donald Ross, Crooks blurted in frustration, “But we can’t prove who shot those agents!”

Peter Mattheissen author of In the Spirit of Crazy Horse

https://www.nybooks.com/articles/2000/07/20/united-states-v-leonard-peltier/ (Emphasis added.)

In April 2022 the FBI released a statement regarding Leonard Peltier:

“The FBI remains resolute against the commutation of Leonard Peltier’s sentence for murdering FBI Special Agents Jack Coler and Ronald Williams at South Dakota’s Pine Ridge Indian Reservation in 1975. We must never forget or put aside that Peltier intentionally and mercilessly murdered these two young men and has never expressed remorse for his ruthless actions.”

“Peltier’s conviction, rightly and fairly obtained …”

The FBI stated this outrageous lie in a letter to the Huffington Post which they published in an article subtitled “The imprisoned Native American rights activist ‘intentionally and mercilessly murdered’ FBI agents, the bureau told Huffington Post. Except that’s not true.”

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/fbi-leonard-peltier-clemency-biden_n_62473d07e4b0587dee695e6e

In 2000 former FBI Director Louie Freeh wrote, “There is no dissent within our agency, only the widespread belief that the criminal justice system of the United States rightly convicted and repeatedly affirmed that Peltier was nothing other than a cold-blooded killer.”

https://www.argusleader.com/story/blogs/jonathanellis/2016/07/27/fbi-leader-thanked-janklow-peltier-matter/87626144/ (Emphasis added.)

In 2017 the Chicago Tribune published an editorial titled “Clemency for Leonard Peltier? Never.” In response to that editorial, James Reynolds, the United States attorney who supervised the prosecution of Leonard Peltier penned his response stating in part: “It is a gross overstatement to label Peltier a ‘cold-blooded murderer.’”

https://www.b12partners.net/wp/2017/01/18/leonard-peltier-should-be-released-in-the-interest-of-justice/

Former U.S. Attorney James Reynolds speaks on behalf of Leonard Peltier at the American Indian Movement’s Grand Governing Council’s Walk to Freedom on Sunday, November 13 in Washington, D.C. (Photo by Darren Thompson for Native News Online). Credit

In July 2021 Reynolds wrote a letter to President Biden stating in part: “We were not able to prove that Mr. Peltier personally committed any offense on the Pine Ridge Reservation.”

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/leonard-peltier-prison-clemency-biden_n_618049f3e4b059d0bfc19e5c

For over 50 years Leonard Peltier has steadfastly denied accusations that he killed the two FBI agents. By all appearances, the FBI out of pure spite and revenge wants Leonard Peltier to die in prison while serving two life sentences for crimes they admit they cannot prove he committed.

Top image credit: Flickr/ Sheila Steele

Source:   https://www.activistpost.com/2024/02/death-squads-and-the-price-of-justice-in-america.html

Wednesday, August 24, 2016

4,000 Native Americans in Bundy Ranch-Style Protest

as DHS Cuts Water Supply — Media Blackout

Published: August 24, 2016
Share | Print This
 
     

Source: Common Dreams

 
water
Cannon Ball, ND — Growing in number and spirit, the Standing Rock Sioux protest against the Dakota Access Pipeline is swiftly gaining strength ahead of a federal hearing on the controversial project. Support has spread across the country, and thousands have descended on the peaceful “prayer camps” in recent days, prompting state officials on Monday to remove the demonstrators’ drinking water supply.
North Dakota homeland security director Greg Wilz ordered the removal of state-owned trailers and water tanks from the protest encampment, despite the sweltering heat, because of alleged disorderly conduct, according to the Bismarck Tribune, including reports of laser pointers aimed at surveillance aircraft.
“People are getting overheated now already,” said Johnelle Leingang, the tribe’s emergency response coordinator, as temperatures hovered around 90ยบ F on Monday. “It’s very hurtful.”
Tribal activists say the state’s response, which includes surveillance, road blockades with military checkpoints, and a state of emergency declaration, has been overly aggressive and manipulative.
“It is deeply ironic that the Governor would release emergency funds under the guise of public health and safety, but then remove the infrastructure that helps ensure health and safety in the camp,” said Tara Houska, national campaigns director for Honor the Earth.
The supplies were provided last week by the North Dakota Department of Health at the tribe’s request to support the roughly 2,500 people now gathered along the Standing Rock reservation’s border on the Cannonball River, near where the pipeline is slated to cross.
LaDonna Allard, director of one of the prayer camps, said, “The gathering here remains 100 percent peaceful and ceremonial, as it has from day one. We are standing together in prayer…Why is a gathering of Indians so inherently threatening and frightening to some people?”
“This is nothing but repression of our growing movement to protect our water and future generations,” Houska added.
Standing Rock spokesman Steven Sitting Bear said he’s received “notifications from tribes all over the country that have caravans in route, so it’s continuing to grow.”
On Wednesday, high profile activists and supporters are rallying in Washington D.C. outside the U.S. District Court, where members of the Standing Rock Sioux will argue that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers granted Energy Transfer Corporation approval for the 1,172-mile pipeline without tribal consent.
The tribe says that the pipeline—which will carry up to 570,000 barrels of fracked Bakken oil daily across four states to a market hub in Illinois—puts the sacred waters of the Missouri River at great risk.
Climate campaigner and 350.org co-founder Bill McKibben penned an op-ed on Monday offering a vision of “what it might mean if the  if the Army Corps, or the Obama administration, simply said: ‘You know what, you’re right. We don’t need to build this pipeline.'”
“It would mean that after 525 years, someone had actually paid attention to the good sense that Native Americans have been offering almost from the start,” he continues:
One has the ominous sense of grim history about to be reenacted at Standing Rock. North Dakota authorities—who are in essence a subsidiary of the fossil fuel industry—have insisted that the Sioux are violent, that they have “pipe bombs.” There are rumors about calling in the National Guard. The possibility for renewed tragedy is very real.
But the possibility for a new outcome is there as well. The Army Corps of Engineers might back off. The president might decide, as he did with Keystone, that this pipeline would “exacerbate” climate change and hence should be reviewed more carefully. We might, after five centuries, actually listen to the only people who’ve ever successfully inhabited this continent for the long term.
Construction on the pipeline remains halted after developers paused the project last week in anticipation of the Wednesday hearing.
Meanwhile, a U.S. District Court hearing on whether a preliminary injunction should be issued against the protesters has been rescheduled from Thursday to Sept. 8, although a restraining order against the demonstrators has also been extended until then. Filing the order on Monday, U.S. District Judge Daniel Hovland wrote that factions are ‘”strongly encouraged to meet and confer in good faith’ to try and resolve the dispute out of court,” the Tribune reported.
Updates are being shared on social media with the hashtags #NoDAPL and#RezpectOurWater.

Share This Article...   

Friday, February 26, 2016


Marco Rubio’s Ties to Sketchy Businesses, Drug Dealing and Ponzi Schemes

How Marco Rubio took $50,000 and voted to deregulate a sleazey businessman who cashed in on cocaine and AIDS


Sen. Marco Rubio campaigns in South Carolina.
Sen. Marco Rubio campaigns in South Carolina. (Photo Alex Wong/Getty Images)
The GOP has been on a crazy bender for more than half a century, but even many party officials can see that Donald Trump and Ted Cruz are too unhinged for the American people to swallow. Hence, Marco Rubio — who’s no genius but can appear on TV without terrifying a majority of the civilian population — was thrust forward in Iowa by GOP puppeteers as a last-gasp effort to save the party from flat out lunacy.
And it worked. Mr. Rubio finished third in Iowa with 23 percent of the vote, thereby prompting an outpouring of support from Wall Street. He was poised for takeoff in New Hampshire, but to his handlers’ horror he repeated his lines at a key debate like a terrified Bar Mitzvah boy practicing in front of the mirror before tripping on the stage stairs, and was mercilessly pillaged by then-candidate Chris Christie, who said, “There it is everybody. The 25-second memorized speech.”
But Mr. Rubio rebounded in South Carolina and came in second in Nevada, and at this point he’s pretty much the last of the chip-implanted Manchurian Candidates that the GOP establishment can use in their quest to derail Trump.There are just a few small problems.
Mr. Rubio has a long track record of corruption that his political enemies will have a simple time exploiting. Most problematically, the FBI has for years been investigating David Rivera, one of Mr. Rubio’s best friends and long-time political allies, and arguably one of the most corrupt members of congress in Florida’s colorful history.
David Rivera at a campaign stop in 2010.
David Rivera at a campaign stop in 2010. (Photo Joe Raedle/Getty Images)
The feds have until 2017 to bring charges against Mr. Rivera, according to this Miami Herald story, and given that evidence against him is strewn about like pizza boxes after a frat house kegger it’s hard to imagine what’s taking so long. As part of its investigation the FBI has probed Mr. Rivera’s ties to Mr. Rubio and their mutual involvement in various shady deals, two sources have told me.
A third source, with direct knowledge of the situation, told me that the FBI refused to cut a deal with a businessman facing indictment who provided federal and state investigators with evidence that Mr. Rivera took a $100,000 bribe from a gambling executive based in Broward County.
The bribe came in the form of a $100,000 campaign contribution. Mr. Rivera agreed to take the cash during a secret meeting with the executive, ran it through a political entity that he claimed his mother was running, and used the money to pay for his personal expenses, said the source, who is a well-connected lawyer in Florida.”
Mr. Rivera and Mr. Rubio — who each received large legal campaign contributions from the gambling industry — subsequently voted against allowing the Seminole tribe to expand its gambling operations in Florida, exactly as the alleged bribe-offering executive wanted.
Of course, the FBI is a highly politicized institution dependent on congressional approval for its budget and historically has gone after political contributors and small-fry politicians while ignoring flagrant corruption by more powerful elected officials. The Herald’s story, which ran in late 2015, speculated that if former Florida state representative and U.S. congressman Mr. Rivera’s close friend Mr. Rubio were to become a serious presidential contender, “prosecutors might want to steer clear of the politically charged case, to avoid the appearance of meddling with an election.”
Mr. Rubio and Mr. Rivera met in 1992 when they both worked for GOP Congressman Lincoln Diaz-Ballart, as I noted in the Observer last month. Mr. Rivera advised Mr. Rubio during his first campaign for the state House in 2000 and Mr. Rubio helped Mr. Rivera win a House seat in 2002. In 2005, Mr. Rivera rounded up the votes Mr. Rubio needed to become Speaker of the Florida House.
Until last year Mr. Rubio and Mr. Rivera co-owned a house in Tallahassee, Florida’s capital.
Lobbyist Dana Hudson posted a photo with David Rivera (far left), pollster Dario Moreno and Rafael "Ralph" Perez at an Iowa Hooters while the group campaigned for Mr. Rivera's friend, presidential candidate Marco Rubio. Ms. Hudson is at center-left.
Lobbyist Dana Hudson posted a photo with David Rivera (far left), pollster Dario Moreno and Rafael “Ralph” Perez at an Iowa Hooters while the group campaigned for Mr. Rivera’s friend, presidential candidate Marco Rubio. Ms. Hudson is at center-left. (Facebook)
“They were thick as thieves,” a former senior official in the Florida GOP who knows both men told me.
In recent years Mr. Rubio has been shy about publicly associating with Mr. Rivera — especially after various state and federal law enforcement agencies began investigating his friend over numerous  allegations of corruption. Those allegations probably help explain why Mr. Rivera lost his seat in the U.S. Congress in 2012 and then was humiliated in 2014 when attempting to regain it, winning only 2,209 votes (8 percent).
But Mr. Rivera was spotted in Iowa during the caucuses with a Washington lobbyist, Dana Hudson, who is one of Mr. Rubio’s most passionate supporters. Mr. Rivera and Hudson posed for a photo at a Hooters, the Tampa Bay Times reported.
One of the schemes the FBI is looking into involves Mr. Rivera secretly receiving about $1 million in the mid-2000s from the Havenick family, which has long thrived in Florida’s notoriously crooked dog track betting industry, whose roots trace back to Meyer Lanksy, Al Capone’s CFO. Mr. Rivera was paid — through a cut-out entity named Millennium Marketing; his name didn’t appear anywhere on the contract— to successfully promote a ballot referendum that gave the Havenick family exclusive rights to offer slot machines at local racing track venues.
Supporters of Rubio in Michigan early this week.
Supporters of Rubio in Michigan early this week. (Photo Bill Pugliano/Getty Images)
When the Florida Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE) investigated the case back in 2011, Alex Havenick, the family patriarch, described Mr. Rivera as the “chief strategist” for the slots referendum campaign and said his family was grateful for the “unbelievable results” he obtained. Mr. Rivera denied any wrongdoing and the FDLE never charged him, probably because the case was politically sabotaged.
Mr. Rivera and Mr. Rubio later voted against legislation — which was also opposed by the Havenicks —  that would have allowed all racetracks to offer their customers slots and thereby ended the family’s monopoly.
Back in 2007, Mr. Rivera organized “Havana Nights” fundraisers that raised $1.4 million for the state GOP. “The events featured a yacht cruise, salsa lessons, dinner at the former Versace mansion and personal concierges available 24/7,” the Miami Herald reported at the time. “The generous contributions come at a time when the industry—dog tracks, horse tracks and jai-alai frontons—is losing attendance and profits, while the parimutuels in Tampa and Broward County may soon face increased competition from Indian casinos.”
In the aftermath of the event then-House Speaker Mr. Rubio came out strongly against a gambling compact being negotiated by Governor Charlie Crist and the Seminoles, which would have allowed the tribe to offer Las Vegas-style slots as well as table games, according to the Herald.
“Rubio’s argument — that the tribe is entitled to nothing more than slot machines — echoes those made by the parimutuels, especially those in Broward, which say that granting table games to the Seminole gives them an unfair advantage,” the Herald reported. The newspaper said that Mr. Rivera bitterly denied that Mr. Rubio’s opposition to the Seminole compact was linked to the massive donations the GOP received from the gambling industry. ”Whether [parimutuels] supported the event had nothing to do with the House having antipathy toward the compact,” he said. “There’s zero correlation.’’
The Seminole Casino Coconut Creek, a major Florida gambling venue.
The Seminole Casino Coconut Creek, a major Florida gambling venue. (Photo Joe Raedle/Getty Images)
The alleged bribe offered to Mr. Rivera I mentioned above, which is previously unreported, came from a Broward County gambling executive, my source told me.
Mr. Rivera and Mr. Rubio were also involved in another dubious deal in the mid-2000s that is breathtakingly brazen even by Florida’s promiscuous standards and which was partially unraveled over many years by a joint FBI/DEA task force. One of the key figures in the scam was Alan Mendelsohn, a GOP lobbyist and fundraiser who raised about $2 million that he funneled to numerous Florida politicians or used for his personal benefit, according to his subsequent indictment. Of that amount about $1.5 million came from a crooked businessman named Joel Steinger.
Steinger was the founder and CEO of a private company called Mutual Benefits Corp., through which he pulled off a $1.2 billion Ponzi scheme that targeted elderly South Florida retirees and members of the state’s gay community. Mutual Benefits Corp. also helped a South American drug cartel launder money, evidence compiled by a the FBI/DEA task force showed.
Mendelsohn funneled money to politicians through various political entities, including a political committee he set up called The Ophthalmology PAC. Steinger gave him money in the hopes of winning political support for a bill that would exempt Mutual Benefits Corp. from state regulation. Mendelsohn also got money to pass along to politicians from a few other dubious players, including a credit counseling firm and gambling companies.
In April of 2004, both Mr. Rubio and Mr. Rivera voted for legislation that exempted Steinger’s Mutual Benefits Corp. from regulation. In May of 2004, the SEC ordered the emergency shutdown of Steinger’s firm.
Mr. Rubio and Mr. Rivera each got $50,000, easily ranking them among the biggest recipients of Ophthalmology PAC cash. Mr. Rubio received his payout from Mendelsohn in December of 2003 through a PAC he set up called Floridians for Conservative Leadership.
The Ophthalmology PAC was by far the biggest donor to Floridians for Conservative Leadership. Mr. Rubio used the latter to pay for, among other things, courier services performed by his wife, sister and nephews; to cover the costs of meals and lodging that were allegedly campaign-related; and to pay a close friend and lobbyist who raised money for him for what was described as political consulting work.
In April of 2004, both Mr. Rubio and Mr. Rivera voted for legislation — which Mendelsohn aggressively lobbied for — that exempted Steinger’s Mutual Benefits Corp. from regulation. In May of 2004, the SEC ordered the emergency shutdown of Steinger’s firm.
As late as 2009, Mendelsohn was one of Mr. Rubio’s leading fundraisers and that year hosted an event at his home to kick off Mr. Rubio’s run for a U.S. Senate seat. That May the Broward Palm Beach New Times reported that Mendelsohn had resigned from his post as treasurer of yet another PAC he had created amid “rampant speculation” about the extent of his ties to Steinger. Mr. Rubio “doesn’t seem very concerned about any political fallout that may come as more facts emerge about Mr. Mendelsohn in the Steinger case,” the newspaper reported. “Either Rubio knows something the rest of us don’t or he doesn’t mind risking his reputation for some serious campaign dough.”
Dr. Alan Mendelsohn.
Dr. Alan Mendelsohn. (Personal Website Screenshot)
In 2011 Mendelsohn was sentenced to three years in prison for using “his political connections to assist clients in obtaining and defeating legislation,” according to his indictment. During his sentencing, Judge William Zloch, said the disgraced lobbyist’s misconduct was like a “cancer” with “tentacles” that hindered good government across the state, according to the Tampa Bay Times. (Mendelsohn’s lawyer, Alvin Entin, declined comment.)
In 2014, Steinger was sentenced to twenty years in prison. “Mr. Steinger, I could very easily sentence you to 50 years as a very justifiable sentence and never lose a moment’s sleep,” Judge Robert Scola said at the time. (Steve Haguel, Steinger’s lawyer, declined comment other than to say that he had appealed the verdict.)
Last year Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) filed a complaint with the IRS against Conservative Solutions Project, a political organization spending millions of dollars on pro-Rubio ads while masquerading as a “social welfare” non-profit. It also filed a criminal complaint against Mr. Rubio’s national finance chairman, Wayne Berman, accusing him of lying to investigators and apparently taking more than a million dollars from a non-profit. And in 2012, CREW named David Rivera as one of the “Most Corrupt Members of Congress.”
“Senator Rubio and his circle are no strangers to ethics issues,” the group’s spokesman, Jordan Libowitz, told me.
Mr. Rubio’s presidential campaign, Mr. Rivera’s attorney, Michael Band, and the FBI declined comment for this story.
Marco Rubio (second from right) with other Republican presidential candidates at a debate in Greenville, S.C.
Marco Rubio (second from right) with other Republican presidential candidates at a debate in Greenville, S.C. (Photo Spencer Platt/Getty Images)
In the 1980s, Joel Steinger and several relatives ran Tara Securities Group, a boiler room that ripped off a boatload of naive investors. (Martin Scorcese’s film The Wolf of Wall Street perfectly captures the boiler room, a term used to describe a fraud by which a scammer rents an impressive-looking office, lines up employees to cold call potential investors, and suckers them into putting their savings into financial schemes promising big returns that never materialize.) The Securities and Exchange Commission shut down Tara Securities Group, banned Steinger from commodities trading and, hit him with a paltry civil fine of $30,000.
Steinger had a sleazy past even before Tara Securities. Back in 1979, the Commodities Futures Trading Commission barred him from acting as a commodity trading professional for his role in another scam that involved a company called Crown Colony Commodity Options Ltd., according to his indictment and several news accounts. Steinger’s colorful career, convictions and mob connections, can be reviewed in this article.
But Steinger still had to make a living so in 1994 he started a new private company, Mutual Benefits Corp., which was in the Viaticals business. That’s the term — derived from a Latin word meaning “provisions for a long journey” — for the practice of buying life insurance policies at a steeply discounted price from desperate people who are about to die.
Steiner quickly figured out that a great place to find dying people who would sell their life insurance policies cheap was the AIDS-plagued gay community in South Florida. So he hooked up with some clinics and doctors and used them to pitch terminally ill HIV patients who were desperate for quick money and would sell their life insurance policies for pennies on the dollar.
The investors in Mutual Benefits Corp. started getting angry when people who sold the firm their life insurance policies didn’t die because that meant they didn’t get the huge returns Steinger promised them.
To ratchet up profits even more Steinger retained a doctor, Clark Mitchell, to diagnose people as being terminally ill when they were in fact perfectly healthy. Of course, the investors in Mutual Benefits Corp. started getting angry when people who sold the firm their life insurance policies didn’t die because that meant they didn’t get the huge returns Steinger promised them (up to 72 percent, according to this story). Investors complained to the Florida Attorney General, who began looking into the situation, which alarmed Steinger.
To remedy the situation, he created a variety of corporate and political entities to donate money to every Democrat in the state legislature. In the last four months of 2002, Steinger-linked entities sent checks totaling $550,000 to the state Democratic Party and $200,000 to the Democratic National Committee. (Steve Geller, a Democratic senator who was influential on insurance issues, “received $5,000 from Mutual Benefits-related sources,” the Sun-Sentinel reported back in a 2009 summary of the whole affair.)
This had the desired effect, and Democrats came together to write a piece of legislation in 2003 that exempted Viaticals from state regulation. Since Steinger’s Mutual Benefits Corp. was a private insurance and investment company, the SEC had no ability to regulate him either. So this legislation would leave Mutual Benefits entirely regulation-free.
Tragically for Steinger, the Democrats didn’t have the political muscle to get the bill passed. So he turned for help to Mendelsohn and sent him money to buy elected Republicans.
Rep. Kim Berfield.
Rep. Kim Berfield. (Florida House of Representatives File Photo)
The state Republican Party received $25,000 from Steinger-linked entities in the year after the vote. A PAC associated with Kim Berfield, then Republican chairwoman of the House insurance committee got $10,000 and a PAC for future Senate leader Ken Pruitt received $2,500.
All told, Mendelsohn, his family and his major political committee contributed at least $708,000 to more than 275 legislators, legislative candidates and state causes, according to the The Tampa Bay Times. Mendelsohn’s average contribution, then, was just $2,574.55.
That’s why the $50,000 received by Mr. Rubio from The Ophthalmology PAC — one of Mendelsohn’s main vehicles to accomplish Steinger’s desires — stands out so much, especially since he got the cash just a few months before he voted to exempt Mutual Benefits Corp. from regulation.
The vote was held in April 2004 — just a month, as it turned out, before the SEC shut down Mutual Benefits Corp. The Steinger/Mendelsohn lobbying strategy was so effective that only one house member and one senator opposed the bill.
The senator, Democrat Skip Campbell, later said that legislators overwhelmingly voted for the bill for one reason only: political contributions. “It was clear to me that this was a big Ponzi scheme and would bite a lot of people,” he told the Sun-Sentinel.
The U.S. Coast Guard raided a Russian fishing vessel off the coast of California and found twelve tons of cocaine on board (under frozen squid).
But in the aftermath of the vote, Steinger, Mendelsohn, Mr. Rubio and almost the entire Florida congress were thrilled with the outcome. It looked like a win-win for them all.
There were just a few problems.
All the complaints from defrauded Mutual Benefits Corp.’s investors caused the state and then the SEC to investigate the firm. And so in May of 2004, two months after Steinger’s near-unanimous political victory, the SEC issued an emergency shut down of his company.
Alas, in 2001 something happened 3000 miles away in California that would prove to be even more fatal (and quite embarrassing) to Steinger’s Mutual Benefits Corp. and its political backers, though no one knew it at the time. What happened was that the U.S. Coast Guard raided a Russian fishing vessel off the coast of California and found twelve tons of cocaine on board (under frozen squid).
That led to the creation of the FBI/DEA task force, which traced the cocaine to Colombia, where, the Chicago Tribune reported, Mutual Benefits was marketing viaticals. The firm’s most successful contractor was Jaime Rey Albornoz, who in 2004 was “indicted as a drug cartel member along with four co-defendants, who are charged with moving millions of illegal drug dollars around the world and into Mutual Benefits investments,” according to the Tribune.
The joint FBI/DEA task force, which was headquartered in Palm Beach County, ultimately came across all the money that Steinger and his surrogate Mendelsohn had spread around to Florida politicians. Over the next few years the feds indicted and convicted a number of people in the affair.
They included Mitchell, the crooked doctor who falsely diagnosed people with AIDS for Steinger (and who it later turned out had defrauded Medicare as well), who pleaded guilty to fraud in 2006; and state Senator Mandy Dawson, who took tens of thousands of dollars in political contributions from Mendelsohn and who was sentenced in 2012 to six months in prison for tax evasion.
Broward County Commissioner Stacy Ritter.
Broward County Commissioner Stacy Ritter. (Wikimedia Commons)
(Somehow Stacy Ritter, who as a member of the Florida House voted for the Steinger-backed legislation, escaped prosecution. Mutual Benefits Corp. paid Ritter’s husband, Russ Klenet, $20,000 a month to lobby for the bill and spent $100,000 to redecorate the couple’s home. After serving in the Florida House, Ms. Ritter became mayor of Broward County and is currently a Broward County Commissioner. Last July, she was cleared by the State Attorney’s Office in three separate public corruption probes alleging she used her position for improper gain,” according to this story.)
The feds also took down Mendelsohn, who in addition to making campaign contributions to buy political influence was nailed for arranging to have “approximately $60,000 in checks [from his political contributors] sent directly to his mistress on a monthly basis for about two years,” according to his indictment. Mendelsohn was released from prison in 2014, the same year that Steinger started serving a 20-year sentence for running the Mutual Benefits Ponzi Scheme.
The federal task force reportedly wanted to go after the politicians who supported Steinger’s pet legislation, especially big recipients of his and Mendelsohn’s political cash. But that’s where things got dicey, presumably because the major politicians who supported Steinger had no intention of going to prison themselves.
First, a Florida judge sealed everything having to do with the ongoing Steinger case just as the feds were getting ready to go after the politicos, which didn’t stop the investigation but helped keep the names of the politicians involved out of the media. The Sun Sentinel newspaper went to court to oppose that, saying that the case should remain open to the public since so many prominent elected officials were under scrutiny, but the newspaper lost in court.
Rubio took $50,000 from Mendelsohn for Floridians for Conservative Leadership, his PAC, and that is quite a bit more than most of his colleagues received from the future jailbird.
However, the judge who sealed the case suddenly and mysteriously recused himself from any further involvement, confessing that he had a conflict of interest — he didn’t say what it was — that required him to step aside. Two U.S. attorneys from Florida who were prosecuting the case recused themselves as well, also citing conflicts of interest that they never disclosed.
There are a few things here that look bad for Mr. Rubio. First, he took $50,000 from Mendelsohn for Floridians for Conservative Leadership, his PAC, and that is quite a bit more than most of his colleagues received from the future jailbird.  And Mendelsohn continued to raise money for him until 2009, five years after the SEC shut down Steinger’s Ponzi scheme.
Second, he used his PAC money to pay relatives like his wife, and the payments to her were made to a company she said she had shut down seven years earlier, according to records filed with the Florida Secretary of State. Furthermore, his PAC paid about $25,000 to a woman named Bridget Nocco, a former Florida House staffer, lobbyist and Rubio fundraiser. And Mr. Rubio also used his PAC to pay for meals and lodging that appear to be only remotely linked to actual campaign work and look more like personal expenses.
Third, Mr. Rubio’s close friend and ally Mr. Rivera has been “circled for years” by investigators, the Miami Herald noted in 2015, and sources have told me the feds are interested in their political partnership.
So how is it that Mr. Rubio has suddenly emerged as a hot commodity in the GOP nomination race? Well, as noted above, his chief rivals are Mr. Trump, an unhinged clown, and Mr. Cruz, a far-right cretin with appalling social views and whose main claim to fame in the foreign policy arena is that he wants to “carpet bomb” the Islamic State.
BESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswyBESbswy
But if the FBI is in fact serious about looking into Marco Rubio, his competitors may start looking a lot more attractive, at least from an electoral standpoint.

http://observer.com/2016/02/marco-rubios-ties-to-sketchy-businesses-drug-dealing-and-ponzi-schemes/

https://www.blogger.com/blogger.g?blogID=7315543258281792782#allposts