Deadly Israeli strike on aid convoy in Gaza was no accident – and the IDF likely knew EXACTLY who they were targeting 04/07/2024 // Cassie B. /

Deadly Israeli strike on aid convoy in Gaza was no accident – and the IDF likely knew EXACTLY who they were targeting

04/07/2024 // Cassie B. /

Israel insists its recent deadly attack on a World Central Kitchen aid convoy in Gaza was nothing more than a tragic accident, but more evidence is emerging that they are not as innocent as they claim.

The April 1 attack killed seven humanitarian aid workers as their vehicles left a warehouse in Gaza. They were providing food aid through the charity, helping to feed starving Gazans as Israel continues to carry out attacks there and cut them off from basic necessities. Disturbing images showed the vehicles completely blown apart by drone missiles.

While Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu tried to play it off as an accident, calling it a “tragic case of our forces unintentionally hitting innocent people,” this characterization immediately came under attack by the World Central Kitchen.

The food charity said that they had been coordinating movements with the IDF, which means they knew exactly where they were. Moreover, their three-vehicle convoy was clearly marked and had the charity’s logo on full display from the roof to ensure it could be identified by air.

Another thing that points to multiple targeted strikes is the fact that each of the three vehicles were hit in succession quickly while moving at a significant distance apart from one another.

A former British Army Major, Chris Lincoln-Jones, shared a similar assessment after reviewing images of the damaged vehicles. He said that the strikes were highly targeted and that the missiles the IDF used were “absolutely, perfectly accurate.”

Moreover, the drone involved is the Elbit Hermes 450, which is considered one of the IDF’s top surveillance, intelligence, reconnaissance and target acquisition vehicles. Boasting infrared and electro-optical cameras, it is capable of capturing high-definition images at all hours of the day and night, so it should have been quite easy for IDF operators to see the World Central Kitchen’s logo on the cars.

We are building the infrastructure of human freedom and empowering people to be informed, healthy and aware. Learn about our free, downloadable AI tools on nutrition, health and preparedness at this article link. Every purchase at HealthRangerStore.com helps fund our efforts to build and share more tools for empowering humanity with knowledge and abundance.

In fact, Lincoln-Jones believes that the IDF would “probably even know the names of the people on board” because it had been moving along a pre-approved route.

World Central Kitchen officials believe aid workers were deliberately targeted

Spanish chef Jose Andres, who founded the World Central Kitchen, and the charity’s CEO, Erin Gore, have both been vocal about accusing the IDF of “systematically” and deliberately targeting them.

Andres said: “'This was not just a bad luck situation where 'oops' we dropped the bomb in the wrong place.

“This was over 1.5km, 1.8km, with a very defined humanitarian convoy that had signs in the top, in the roof, a very colourful logo... It's very clear who we are and what we do.”

Gore added that Israeli authorities were fully aware of the route, itinerary and humanitarian mission of the convoy.

IDF is trying to claim incident was a case of mistaken identity

The IDF has since fired a pair of senior officers and reprimanded one of its top commanders following an investigation into the incident. They stated that “those who approved the strike were convinced that they were targeting armed Hamas operatives,” and characterized the attack as “a grave mistake stemming from a serious failure due to a mistaken identification.”

They maintain that the IDF officers involved in the incident “misidentified” an object that was slung over the shoulders of a passenger in the convoy as a weapon; they now believe the object was a bag. When the convoy left the warehouse, an IDF commander “mistakenly assumed that the gunmen were located inside the accompanying vehicles and that these were Hamas terrorists,” according to a report.

They also claim their drones were unable to see the charity’s logo on the vehicles in the darkness of night.

Perhaps most chillingly, they admitted that some of the workers who had been traveling in the first car of the convoy survived the strike on it and fled to the second convoy, but then died when it was targeted as well.

Sources for this article include:

DailyMail.co.uk

CNN.com

 Source:  naturalnews.com

Blogger's note:  Netanyahu and his henchmen are far worse that any mass murderer that have ever existed.

 

U.S. Bombing of a Doctors Without Borders Hospital in Afghanistan Was No Accident – “It Was the Target”

The official story has changed in the days since this inexcusable act of barbarism became public

by Michael Krieger | Liberty Blitzkrieg | October 7, 2015

 

In particular, MSF (Doctors Without Borders) quickly publicized numerous facts that cast serious doubt on the original U.S. claim that the strike on the hospital was just an accident. To begin with, the organization had repeatedly advised the U.S. military of the exact GPS coordinates of the hospital. They did so most recently on September 29, just five days before the strike. Beyond that, MSF personnel at the facility “frantically” called U.S. military officials during the strike to advise them that the hospital was being hit and to plead with them to stop, but the strikes continued in a “sustained” manner for 30 more minutes.  
– From Glenn Greenwald’s article: The Radically Changing Story of the U.S. Airstrike on Afghan Hospital: From Mistake to Justification
By now, all of you will have read about the U.S. military’s recent bombing of a Doctors Without Borders hospital in Kunduz, Afghanistan. What you may not be aware of, is how much the official story has changed in the days since this inexcusable act of barbarism became public.

Doctors Without Borders has been calling the attack a “war crime,” which to the average American sounds outlandish and impossible. The justification for this claim is simple — that the airstrike wasn’t an accident at all, and that the U.S. military intentionally targeted the hospital. As the days go by, it becomes increasingly clear that this is indeed the case, and the Pentagon is now scrambling to justify the intentional targeting of a hospital. As Glenn Greenwald reports at the Intercept:

When news first broke of the U.S. airstrike on the Doctors Without Borders hospital in Kunduz, Afghanistan, the response from the U.S. military was predictable and familiar. It was all just a big, terrible mistake, its official statement suggested: an airstrike it carried out in Kunduz “may have resulted in collateral damage to a nearby medical facility.” Oops: our bad. Fog of war, errant bombs, and all that.
In this case, though, the U.S. military bombed the hospital of an organization – Doctors Without Borders (Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF)) – run by western-based physicians and other medical care professionals. They are not so easily ignored. Doctors who travel to dangerous war zones to treat injured human beings are regarded as noble and trustworthy. They’re difficult to marginalize and demonize. They give compelling, articulate interviews in English to U.S. media outlets. They are heard, and listened to. In particular, MSF quickly publicized numerous facts that cast serious doubt on the original U.S. claim that the strike on the hospital was just an accident. To begin with, the organization had repeatedly advised the U.S. military of the exact GPS coordinates of the hospital. They did so most recently on September 29, just five days before the strike. Beyond that, MSF personnel at the facility “frantically” called U.S. military officials during the strike to advise them that the hospital was being hit and to plead with them to stop, but the strikes continued in a “sustained” manner for 30 more minutes.  All of these facts make it extremely difficult – even for U.S. media outlets – to sell the “accident” story. At least as likely is that the hospital was deliberately targeted, chosen either by Afghan military officials who fed the coordinates to their U.S. military allies and/or by the U.S. military itself. The New York Times today – in a story ostensibly about the impact on area residents from the hospital’s destruction – printed paragraphs from anonymous officials justifying this strike: “there was heavy gunfire in the area around the hospital at the time of the airstrike, and that initial reports indicated that the Americans and Afghans on the ground near the hospital could not safely pull back without being dangerously exposed. American forces on the ground then called for air support, senior officials said.” It also claimed that “many residents of Kunduz, as well as people in Kabul, seemed willing to believe the accusations of some Afghan officials that there were Taliban fighters in the hospital shooting at American troops.”  So now we’re into full-on justification mode: yes, we did it; yes, we did it on purpose; and we’re not sorry because we were right to do so since we think some Taliban fighters were at the hospital, perhaps even shooting at us. In response to the emergence of this justification claim, MSF expressed the exact level of revulsion appropriate (emphasis added): “MSF is disgusted by the recent statements coming from some Afghanistan government authorities justifying the attack on its hospital in Kunduz. These statements imply that Afghan and US forces working together decided to raze to the ground a fully functioning hospital with more than 180 staff and patients inside because they claim that members of the Taliban were present.  “This amounts to an admission of a war crime. This utterly contradicts the initial attempts of the US government to minimize the attack as ‘collateral damage.’ From the start, MSF made clear that none of its staff at the hospital heard or saw Taliban fighters engaging U.S. or Afghan forces. But even if there were, only the most savage barbarians would decide that it’s justified to raze a hospital filled with doctors, nurses and patients to the ground. Yet mounting evidence suggests that this is exactly what the U.S. military did – either because it chose to do so or because its Afghan allies fed them the coordinates of this hospital which they have long disliked. As a result, we now have U.S. and Afghan officials expressly justifying the consummate war crime: deliberately attacking a hospital filled with doctors, nurses and wounded patients. And whatever else is true, the story of what happened here has been changing rapidly as facts emerge proving the initial claims to be false.
So now we know what actually happened. Our Afghan “allies” disliked the hospital because the doctors there dared to care for human beings who they deemed to be “the enemy.” As such, they decided to invent a story, thus easily convincing the U.S. military to take out a hospital. A hospital whose coordinates were already well known ahead of time by. If that’s not a war crime, I don’t know what is. For more, watch this interview on MSNBC of the Guardian’s National Security editor, Spencer Ackerman: So will anyone within the U.S. military-intelligence-industrial complex be held accountable? Don’t be ridiculous. For related articles, see: David Petraeus – How This Leaker of Classified Information is Peddling KKR Funds as Opposed to Serving Jail Time Some Leaks Are More Equal Than Others – Hypocritical D.C. Insiders Line up to Defend General Petraeus from Prosecution Fighting for Pedophilia – It’s Official U.S. Government Policy to Allow Afghan “Allies” to Rape Little Boys Further Details Emerge on the Epic U.S. Foreign Policy Disaster that is Syria In Liberty,
Michael Krieger

Note:  Could not post the video from MSNBC